Going over these quotes, I personally fail to see where this quote in anyway shape or form is positively tied to NESARA.
It appears to me as a cheap cop-out, and is hardly convincing to accept the premise of NESARA being a valid issue.
I like the story. But that is akin to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. A mixture of fact and fiction.
And as long as no documentary evidence is brought forward pertaining to the key issues as represented in my post, what reason is there to ascribe any validity or credibility to it. I likened it to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. Many a website was caught up in it.
It doesn't mean that eye of the public is not steered towards the more nefarious components of it, like illuminati, Deep State, and historical connotations. It indeed did that, and for the better I should add.
So, by the same token, I don' t think it is a bad idea to consider the ideas contained within NESARA/ GESARA. As a libertarian minded person, I am all for a stable value currency system, and inherently opposed to the current fiat scam.
Also, by the same token, it is not a bad idea to think about the Great Reset and built back better. It sounds good, until the details are dissected.
As opposed to NESARA, the Great Reset is based on published documentary evidence. Even even when this documentary evidence was shown, and shown how the politicians were simply echoing the same line: unique window to built back better, it was denounced as a conspiracy, not worth thinking about.
As opposed to NESARA, the law that allowed the establishment of the FED, though sneakily done on Christmas day 1913 with a small quorum, the documentary evidence is simply there. And how long has it taken to make people more aware of what the FED actually is? I dare say, these last 5 -10 years, people more generally were open to the idea, but even then, it still does not reach the logical thinking depth of their brains.
So, again, I have been familiar with NESARA back when it was hushly discussed on Above Top Secret site: And I am simply asking for documentary evidence. Show me it has been sent to the President's desk. I'll settle for that, because that record does not contain the contents of the Act, or who voted on and for it. According to rules and regulations of the House and Senate, even under the original Constitution, it MUST be recorded.
If not, then the Act is illegitimate. Considering then that the Act is allegedly voted on by appealing to provisions of the original Constitution, it follows that it must have been recorded. The contrary would be unconstitutional and counter to the oath the military has taken.
Another thought: Are we to conclude that, despite the fact that the DS is totally opposed to us normies, they act in the light of day? But the Patriots must resort to covert means?
I would say: yes, because reading through Q posts, it seems to me, that covert means are the way to go. First Q itself. Second, the covert way of messaging, platform and contents. Third: several of Q's posts relate to special operations cloaked in secrecy.
This is a nice dark to light comparison.
But this does not mean NESARA is LAW. It could be that it should have been.
And additionally, it is difficult to see how it relates to the Dragon family and General Dunford being named the President. I guess this is another layer of unsubstantiated misinformation.
Or concerning those trillions (yes, trillions ....) put in European banks in 1995 or there about. for one, this could not have been Eastern European banks.
Second, depositing funds into a bank causes the basis, on which the banks can create credit, to expand. However, no bank record is showing such expansion. It would also fly in the face of the banking trouble anti Euro implementation.
Such deposits must show up somewhere, if they are indeed deposited with Banks. However, it is easy to store it in a non-disclosed location covered by a black budget. Again, it sounds exiting, but I doubt the veracity.
Looking at it from a different angle:
Q4641:
THE SWAMP RUNS DEEP.
Sometimes you cannot tell people the truth.
You must show them.
Only then, at the precipice, will people find the will to change [to participate].
We, the People, have been betrayed for a very long time.
WILL YOU STAND?
FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.
FOR FREEDOM.
FOR HUMANITY.
WHERE WE GO ONE
WE GO ALL !!!
Q
What precipice could that be, in relation to the people demanding reforms a la NESARA? How about the total destruction of the financial system, which is being held back? Even the WEF wants it. The only difference is, they want to impose their system to keep power. But what if the demanded change causes them to lose power, because they really fucked it up.
Would then such proposals be easily passed? Yes, I think so.
With all this in mind, I think NESARA is not a viable story to go with as it now stands. It is difficult to see how it is law.
Q: "We have it all."
I like your quote.
This is a list of all the times it appears in Q-drops
https://qagg.news/?q=we+have+it+all
Going over these quotes, I personally fail to see where this quote in anyway shape or form is positively tied to NESARA.
It appears to me as a cheap cop-out, and is hardly convincing to accept the premise of NESARA being a valid issue.
I like the story. But that is akin to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. A mixture of fact and fiction.
And as long as no documentary evidence is brought forward pertaining to the key issues as represented in my post, what reason is there to ascribe any validity or credibility to it. I likened it to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. Many a website was caught up in it.
It doesn't mean that eye of the public is not steered towards the more nefarious components of it, like illuminati, Deep State, and historical connotations. It indeed did that, and for the better I should add.
So, by the same token, I don' t think it is a bad idea to consider the ideas contained within NESARA/ GESARA. As a libertarian minded person, I am all for a stable value currency system, and inherently opposed to the current fiat scam.
Also, by the same token, it is not a bad idea to think about the Great Reset and built back better. It sounds good, until the details are dissected.
As opposed to NESARA, the Great Reset is based on published documentary evidence. Even even when this documentary evidence was shown, and shown how the politicians were simply echoing the same line: unique window to built back better, it was denounced as a conspiracy, not worth thinking about.
As opposed to NESARA, the law that allowed the establishment of the FED, though sneakily done on Christmas day 1913 with a small quorum, the documentary evidence is simply there. And how long has it taken to make people more aware of what the FED actually is? I dare say, these last 5 -10 years, people more generally were open to the idea, but even then, it still does not reach the logical thinking depth of their brains.
So, again, I have been familiar with NESARA back when it was hushly discussed on Above Top Secret site: And I am simply asking for documentary evidence. Show me it has been sent to the President's desk. I'll settle for that, because that record does not contain the contents of the Act, or who voted on and for it. According to rules and regulations of the House and Senate, even under the original Constitution, it MUST be recorded.
If not, then the Act is illegitimate. Considering then that the Act is allegedly voted on by appealing to provisions of the original Constitution, it follows that it must have been recorded. The contrary would be unconstitutional and counter to the oath the military has taken.
Another thought: Are we to conclude that, despite the fact that the DS is totally opposed to us normies, they act in the light of day? But the Patriots must resort to covert means?
I would say: yes, because reading through Q posts, it seems to me, that covert means are the way to go. First Q itself. Second, the covert way of messaging, platform and contents. Third: several of Q's posts relate to special operations cloaked in secrecy.
This is a nice dark to light comparison.
But this does not mean NESARA is LAW. It could be that it should have been.
And additionally, it is difficult to see how it relates to the Dragon family and General Dunford being named the President. I guess this is another layer of unsubstantiated misinformation.
Or concerning those trillions (yes, trillions ....) put in European banks in 1995 or there about. for one, this could not have been Eastern European banks. Second, depositing funds into a bank causes the basis, on which the banks can create credit, to expand. However, no bank record is showing such expansion. It would also fly in the face of the banking trouble anti Euro implementation.
Such deposits must show up somewhere, if they are indeed deposited with Banks. However, it is easy to store it in a non-disclosed location covered by a black budget. Again, it sounds exiting, but I doubt the veracity.
Looking at it from a different angle:
Q4641:
What precipice could that be, in relation to the people demanding reforms a la NESARA? How about the total destruction of the financial system, which is being held back? Even the WEF wants it. The only difference is, they want to impose their system to keep power. But what if the demanded change causes them to lose power, because they really fucked it up.
Would then such proposals be easily passed? Yes, I think so.
With all this in mind, I think NESARA is not a viable story to go with as it now stands. It is difficult to see how it is law.