Sidney Powell Argues Her Dominion Defamation Lawsuit Be Tossed Because ‘No Reasonable Person’ Would Believe Her - The Great Awakening

Sidney Powell Argues Her Dominion Defamation Lawsuit Be Tossed Because ‘No Reasonable Person’ Would Believe Her (www.forbes.com)

posted 3 years ago by truthloveliberty 3 years ago by truthloveliberty +19 / -3

10 comments

10 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (10)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– bubble_bursts 5 points 3 years ago +7 / -2

Why are you posting this obvious fake news shill post?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– truthloveliberty [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

So everyone here knows what is being said so we can argue against it better.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– ange 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The cites the Superme Court case “NYT vs Sullivan” to defend her freedom to make “wild accusations.” “Coincidentally,” this is the same case that a federal judge pushed back on last week, saying that it gives too much ability for the press/media to slant the news. ? https://www-politico-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.politico.com/amp/news/2021/03/19/defamation-law-media-protection-477193?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2021%2F03%2F19%2Fdefamation-law-media-protection-477193

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Quicide 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Since it's not coming from Newsmax, I honestly do not want to hear it.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q