Every cell in our bodies is full of mRNA at every moment of our lives
mRNA does not alter DNA (except under a very specific set of conditions that has nothing to do with the vaccine)
if mRNA altered DNA our DNA would be completely fubar and quite frankly, life never would have existed, since our cells are full of mRNA.
Every cell biologist knows this
Most doctors don't know this, because cell biology is very complicated and doctors don't learn it very well as part of their M.D. (or undergrad)
The person who is being quoted did NOT say the mRNA in the vaccine will alter the DNA
The person writing the article says:
When “changing” a line of code or “introducing” a line of code” (referring to DNA), the “code” or DNA is then altered, meaning the individual or “subject” has now had their genome changed to what the “scientists” have coded.
Of course this has nothing to do with the truth. The author is either writing on something they don't understand at all (very likely), or they are intentionally trying to frighten. The highlighted part in the quote above is the authors assumption, and it is a false assumption.
The "code" the Moderna guy is talking about is the mRNA. Its completely obvious that's what he means in context, and indeed, that is just standard knowledge in cell biology. mRNA is very much like software. Software is code. That's what he was talking about, and that's what was said. To force him to mean something other than what he meant in context is what I like to call...
The problem with "reliable sources" in this context is there is so much legitimate looking disinformation out there. Unless one is already suspect of them, they won't necessarily be looking for it and will get caught in the trap. I am also a researcher in a related field of study to the vaccines (bio-nanotechnology). If I wasn't spending way too much of my life looking into this stuff, I would not appreciate the extent of the misdirection, both on the public and on researchers.
I recommend your niece look at previous coronavirus vaccines to get a better idea of the problems encountered there that have not been studied in these vaccines.
This link is just to google scholar. Any peer review database will work just as well. The key is to look before 2019 (as this link does). Many papers published after that are full of disinformation intended (or unintended) to mislead.
Because the reality of both the Covid-19 data and the vaccine data are being hidden and/or straight up lied about, no one should participate in this experiment. My research into the data suggests that unless you are vitamin D deficient (and zinc, and magnesium, etc.) you are at less risk from the virus than the vaccine. More than that though, this hiding of data constitutes a crime against humanity (informed consent per the Nuremberg code).
As for the 8 weeks theory, that is not supported by previous experiments in coronavirus vaccines. On the contrary, previous experiments show that the vaccines caused deleterious effects when recipients encountered the real virus at some point in the future. Included in those deleterious effects was death at an average rate of 5% of the test subjects.
I do not know that this will happen with the current slate of vaccines, but I do know that the problem of pathogenic priming that previous vaccines suffered from was not tested in an animal model as required by the Nuremberg code. That is another crime against humanity being perpetrated by the pushers of these vaccines.
We don't need to be afraid the vaccine alters DNA because it doesn't. We should be afraid of those encouraging the vaccine because they are lying. By extension we should be very wary of the vaccine itself, and we should recognize it isn't necessary for anyone to get it, because the data suggests coronavirus is not as bad as it is purported to be.
You must be getting tired of debunking this mRNA in vaccine modifies your DNA talk. This is at least the third such post which has stated that. Thanks for your diligence.
Facts:
The person writing the article says:
Of course this has nothing to do with the truth. The author is either writing on something they don't understand at all (very likely), or they are intentionally trying to frighten. The highlighted part in the quote above is the authors assumption, and it is a false assumption.
The "code" the Moderna guy is talking about is the mRNA. Its completely obvious that's what he means in context, and indeed, that is just standard knowledge in cell biology. mRNA is very much like software. Software is code. That's what he was talking about, and that's what was said. To force him to mean something other than what he meant in context is what I like to call...
Fake News.
The problem with "reliable sources" in this context is there is so much legitimate looking disinformation out there. Unless one is already suspect of them, they won't necessarily be looking for it and will get caught in the trap. I am also a researcher in a related field of study to the vaccines (bio-nanotechnology). If I wasn't spending way too much of my life looking into this stuff, I would not appreciate the extent of the misdirection, both on the public and on researchers.
I recommend your niece look at previous coronavirus vaccines to get a better idea of the problems encountered there that have not been studied in these vaccines.
This link is just to google scholar. Any peer review database will work just as well. The key is to look before 2019 (as this link does). Many papers published after that are full of disinformation intended (or unintended) to mislead.
Because the reality of both the Covid-19 data and the vaccine data are being hidden and/or straight up lied about, no one should participate in this experiment. My research into the data suggests that unless you are vitamin D deficient (and zinc, and magnesium, etc.) you are at less risk from the virus than the vaccine. More than that though, this hiding of data constitutes a crime against humanity (informed consent per the Nuremberg code).
As for the 8 weeks theory, that is not supported by previous experiments in coronavirus vaccines. On the contrary, previous experiments show that the vaccines caused deleterious effects when recipients encountered the real virus at some point in the future. Included in those deleterious effects was death at an average rate of 5% of the test subjects.
I do not know that this will happen with the current slate of vaccines, but I do know that the problem of pathogenic priming that previous vaccines suffered from was not tested in an animal model as required by the Nuremberg code. That is another crime against humanity being perpetrated by the pushers of these vaccines.
We don't need to be afraid the vaccine alters DNA because it doesn't. We should be afraid of those encouraging the vaccine because they are lying. By extension we should be very wary of the vaccine itself, and we should recognize it isn't necessary for anyone to get it, because the data suggests coronavirus is not as bad as it is purported to be.
You must be getting tired of debunking this mRNA in vaccine modifies your DNA talk. This is at least the third such post which has stated that. Thanks for your diligence.
It is a daily effort.
This is a disinformation war. If I can't stop it here, in an area where I am (relatively speaking) an expert, I am not doing my part in it.
I took out the text as I was wrong. Apologies.
Says otherwise to what? If you wish to dispute something I said you must be more specific so I can respond appropriately.
Better yet, have your wife respond so two scientists can discuss science rather than through a middleman.
Apparently I misinterpreted you and she straightened me out. So my apologies sir.