There are lots of violent crazy leftists, and the MSM has programmed them with TDS for years. FBI certainly has a history of doing what you said, but may not be necessary with these leftists. But if FBI knew in advance he planned to attack a Trump rally last year, then they obviously were complicit.
I'm confused about this one as well, the shooter does not serve their agenda, so that would make it seem organic, until you watch the two videos, one the guy recording with his cellphone outside the store is such bad acting that Babylon Bee could have made it a good satire piece. The other guy that is interviewed just nonchalantly chuckles when describing what should be a horrific and terrifying ordeal, so why would they set all of this up, yet have a non white shooter who fits their agenda?
Yes, the two I'm referring to leave no doubt in my mind at all, but the shooter doesn't work for the FF narrative, unless it was set up that way on purpose to make people think, and start to wonder, all of those check marks on Twitter had 24 hours to go off on the white supremacists narrative, and got everyone looking into it, perhaps this is a redpill in disguise?
Remember the pulse nightclub shooting? Muslim guy shoots up a gay club and the media says it wasn't because he was muslim, he was just a self-hating gay. Anytime a white guy shoots up a place, he's immediately labeled a "white supremacist", and if you question that, you're a "white supremacist" too.
FF like Boston bombers.....they knew about them And they miraculously dropped off their radar…
There are lots of violent crazy leftists, and the MSM has programmed them with TDS for years. FBI certainly has a history of doing what you said, but may not be necessary with these leftists. But if FBI knew in advance he planned to attack a Trump rally last year, then they obviously were complicit.
The Tsarnaev Brothers were also Muslim.......
I'm confused about this one as well, the shooter does not serve their agenda, so that would make it seem organic, until you watch the two videos, one the guy recording with his cellphone outside the store is such bad acting that Babylon Bee could have made it a good satire piece. The other guy that is interviewed just nonchalantly chuckles when describing what should be a horrific and terrifying ordeal, so why would they set all of this up, yet have a non white shooter who fits their agenda?
Yes, the two I'm referring to leave no doubt in my mind at all, but the shooter doesn't work for the FF narrative, unless it was set up that way on purpose to make people think, and start to wonder, all of those check marks on Twitter had 24 hours to go off on the white supremacists narrative, and got everyone looking into it, perhaps this is a redpill in disguise?
Remember the pulse nightclub shooting? Muslim guy shoots up a gay club and the media says it wasn't because he was muslim, he was just a self-hating gay. Anytime a white guy shoots up a place, he's immediately labeled a "white supremacist", and if you question that, you're a "white supremacist" too.
Double standard much?
“White-looking guy” is often how he’s being described now, in the context of explaining why police “let him live.”
Why not both
Shove in anti-gun laws AND provide a reason to do more middle east wars
You realize 'terror' from Muslims is almost all false flags right?
Wrong.
White people terror=FF Muslim terror=real K the most famous 'muslim' terror attack in history was a ff, 9/11
So is the DS play to use Muslims in FF shootings to amp up anti-gun narrative inciting conservatives to react in the pro-2nd vs. Muslim spectrum?
White hat false flag..enjoy the show
Need to revive middle east narrative. More people dying from food poisoning or (insert anything) than terror.
Also are we sure anyone died yet. Im still waiting on more info. I usually give it a couple weeks before I dig for inconsistency.
Both - ban guns and start a war
Killed ten people. Take his life immediately. Send the real message that we the people want sent. If not soon we will send it ourselves.
We want the country they falsely led us to believe we had. With or without them.