Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition which may be true - may be not. My response was too someone outside of the MSM referring to Q by that name which you further reinforced by saying he 'interviews with the MSM and HBO".
Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.
There were actually a lot of anons that never used that word - because Q is Q and anons are anons. We knew Q as Q. It just felt weird to tack "anon" onto it. So it was pretty funny when Q said as much as a way to skewer the media. I've used it against Democrats since then - they get all wound up about QANON and when I say "there is no such thing as QANON" when I am actually wearing a Q logo....they just don't know what to do with themselves. It's very deflating.
Not true. Codemonkey refers to Q as QAnon in the HBO documentary. Just trying to keep things accurate.
Codemonkey glows.
HINT: If we know your name, you are not anon.
HINT: If you're lining up to do interviews with the MSM and for HBO as an emissary of the Q community, you are not anon.
HINT: If your "biggest drop in history" is linking to NeonRevolt, another name faggot, you are not anon.
This is not a popular opinion here but it is on the chans
Be weary of namefags
STOP KICKING HIM HES ALREADY DEAD
Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition which may be true - may be not. My response was too someone outside of the MSM referring to Q by that name which you further reinforced by saying he 'interviews with the MSM and HBO".
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.
Codemonkey also asserts he is just the admin of a board Q has decided to use. He is just as capable of being wrong as any Normie.
The term was accurate and every anon was OK with it until late 2020s Q drop.
There were actually a lot of anons that never used that word - because Q is Q and anons are anons. We knew Q as Q. It just felt weird to tack "anon" onto it. So it was pretty funny when Q said as much as a way to skewer the media. I've used it against Democrats since then - they get all wound up about QANON and when I say "there is no such thing as QANON" when I am actually wearing a Q logo....they just don't know what to do with themselves. It's very deflating.