Right. And the key point in that legalese statement is "statements of fact." Legal statements are not "facts" until proven in a court of law. As her statements have not yet been proven in a court of law, those statements cannot be considered as facts.
Almost all th media outlets have interpreted her words wrong. According to Sidney Powell herself, this is just legal jargon needed for the legal filing itself. She's backed the Deep State and Dominion into a corner with this filing. Puts the onus of proving her claims on them. Which means they'd be fools to drop it, and even bigger fools to pursue their lawsuit. Genius.
Drawing eyes to dickbutt (story is linked right there) and therefore Suez etc from people wanting to get their mad on about Sidney and that whole spectrum.
I like how they misinterpret these words, and specifically ignore the ones IN THE SAME DOCUMENT that say she still believes her claims to be true. Solid reporting.
Breitbart was one of the first I dumped right after the election. Gateway Pundit is getting close with everything "Breaking!!!" but nothing coming of it. Click bait central at GP
Andrew would be rolling over in his grave with how left leaning his news organization has become.
Right. And the key point in that legalese statement is "statements of fact." Legal statements are not "facts" until proven in a court of law. As her statements have not yet been proven in a court of law, those statements cannot be considered as facts.
^^^Facts
Almost all th media outlets have interpreted her words wrong. According to Sidney Powell herself, this is just legal jargon needed for the legal filing itself. She's backed the Deep State and Dominion into a corner with this filing. Puts the onus of proving her claims on them. Which means they'd be fools to drop it, and even bigger fools to pursue their lawsuit. Genius.
sindey powell is no ones fool
and i bet plays a kickass game of chess
So Breitbart has become full retard ?
Yes. Months ago
Well yes but actually no.
https://xkcd.com/357/
Drawing eyes to dickbutt (story is linked right there) and therefore Suez etc from people wanting to get their mad on about Sidney and that whole spectrum.
It's vinegar and honey, a classic combination.
Hey, publicity is publicity, right?
As for her, surely this is the end for Trump wait no Lindell wait no Guliani wait no Powell this time. Surely.
I like how they misinterpret these words, and specifically ignore the ones IN THE SAME DOCUMENT that say she still believes her claims to be true. Solid reporting.
So then by posting this the question comes up, do we support her? yes or no?
I think her website clarifies what her statement means with respect to her case...
https://defendingtherepublic.org/
Breitbart was one of the first I dumped right after the election. Gateway Pundit is getting close with everything "Breaking!!!" but nothing coming of it. Click bait central at GP