no there is no evidence you can point to models right that doesnt count. Just like there is no evidence we evolved from wet rocks. sorry bro look into Kurt Wise or Kent Hovind
No ur confused lol evidence is based on empirical science. Aka what can be known from observing. You never observed the age of the earth nor a wet rock making DNA. Time to hit the books baby
Theres no evidence for an earth more than 10,000 years old tbh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shyI-aQaXD0&t
There's quite a lot of evidence. Maybe you think there is no "proof" but radiocarbon dating is evidence, stratigraphic superposition is evidence.
Yea in your mind that constitues evidence I truly believe you are being honest
no there is no evidence you can point to models right that doesnt count. Just like there is no evidence we evolved from wet rocks. sorry bro look into Kurt Wise or Kent Hovind
I think you are confused by the terms evidence and proof.
Also the first cell likely came from protobionts not "wet rocks."
No ur confused lol evidence is based on empirical science. Aka what can be known from observing. You never observed the age of the earth nor a wet rock making DNA. Time to hit the books baby
True and it got along just fine before that soft dicked kid loving nerd.
no need for anger. overcome the beta state