The state of the art quantum computers you can find at university labs are completely and utterly useless compared to classical computers, with the exception of extremely contrived problems (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5).
I swear this quantum computer nonsense is shilling designed to make Q followers look like they just accept things at face value. The only apparent advantage a quantum computer has over a classical computer is a theoretical (asymptotic, worst case) speedup on some classes of algorithms. A classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, i.e perform the exact same computations. And like I just said, the best quantum computers cannot get a real speedup on almost any problems. There is no super secret quantum research and engineering group that is twenty years ahead of everyone else, because it is a monumental effort of design and engineering and iteration that no single Einstein could do on his own.
As a programmer, I roll my eyes when I hear Q using a quantum computer for machine learning probability calculation.
I'm not a Q supporter either, I just appreciate the research the Q community did and does into these Deep State pedos and human traffickers(let's just call it what it is, they're slavers), and how Q/the Q community exposed them. For that, I am grateful.
Q can be a great spectator sport. Tons of interesting people and perspectives. Yes, there is stupid and some “out there” stuff. But overall, at 60, the last 3 years have been the thrill ride of my life. Amazing time to be alive.
Quantum computing can in fact only offer an improvement in speed, given what is understood about the fundamental underlying physics. There is no algorithm a quantum computer can run that the computer you are using to read this cannot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis
Point noted. Thanks for the reality check. I'd gotten in the habit of talking about quantum computing flippantly mostly when I get caught up in an exciting moment.
I will say however, I'm sort of a believer that time travel, and thus technology from the future being involved. However, you're correct in that... I should chose the time and place to just make silly comments.
The state of the art quantum computers you can find at university labs are completely and utterly useless compared to classical computers, with the exception of extremely contrived problems (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5).
I swear this quantum computer nonsense is shilling designed to make Q followers look like they just accept things at face value. The only apparent advantage a quantum computer has over a classical computer is a theoretical (asymptotic, worst case) speedup on some classes of algorithms. A classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, i.e perform the exact same computations. And like I just said, the best quantum computers cannot get a real speedup on almost any problems. There is no super secret quantum research and engineering group that is twenty years ahead of everyone else, because it is a monumental effort of design and engineering and iteration that no single Einstein could do on his own.
Yup.
As a programmer, I roll my eyes when I hear Q using a quantum computer for machine learning probability calculation.
I'm not a Q supporter either, I just appreciate the research the Q community did and does into these Deep State pedos and human traffickers(let's just call it what it is, they're slavers), and how Q/the Q community exposed them. For that, I am grateful.
Q can be a great spectator sport. Tons of interesting people and perspectives. Yes, there is stupid and some “out there” stuff. But overall, at 60, the last 3 years have been the thrill ride of my life. Amazing time to be alive.
I like to still keep an open mind. These help:
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/fuse
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/forest?highlight=WyJmb3Jlc3QiXQ==
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/ace
Everyone should read these summaries at least. This is USG publicly stating they are researching the bleeding edge of predictive text and ML.
Quantum computers represent a technological leap.
That doesn't strictly mean speed -- New technology is iterative and in a lot of cases start off weaker, but with greater potential.
Quantum computing can in fact only offer an improvement in speed, given what is understood about the fundamental underlying physics. There is no algorithm a quantum computer can run that the computer you are using to read this cannot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis
Point noted. Thanks for the reality check. I'd gotten in the habit of talking about quantum computing flippantly mostly when I get caught up in an exciting moment.
I will say however, I'm sort of a believer that time travel, and thus technology from the future being involved. However, you're correct in that... I should chose the time and place to just make silly comments.
All puns intended. Thanks the chin check. ?