Lets compare a few things Q told us and what Ghost Ezra is telling us on the same topic:
-
Flat Earth Q was asked by an anon if we can rest the topic once and for all. Is the eart flat? Q: No it’s round Ghost Ezra is telling us the earth is flat and to wake up.
-
Moon landing Q was asked by an anon if the moon landing was fake? Q: We were at the moon Ghost Ezra is telling us we weren’t at the moon and to wake up.
-
Most important topic: NO OUTSIDE COMMS Ghost Ezra is pretending to be Ezra Cohen-Watnick. He pretends to have ties to the plan and DJT. Either you trust Q or Ghost Ezra. One of them is a LARP so be careful who you follow fellow pedes.
I know everyone is here for hopium but he is getting shared more and more on this page so I just wanted to clear that up.
Ghostezra has his own beliefs. It’s up to us whether or not we want to believe them. We are all searching for answers.. some of us will be right and some of us will be wrong. I personally believe the earth is round and I personally believe the moon landing 1969 was a hoax. Now whether or not we’ve been to the moon in other terms - who knows?
Took the words from my mouth. Not every Q follower will have the full story and those who believe falsehoods aren’t necessarily shills or deceivers. I have been guilty of sharing miss information on accident for the sake of getting truth to people I love. I mean well always and hope to find truth. Some information just feels right at the time, you know?
It is hard to believe we were able to get there and back with tech from that era. The computing power is equivalent to like a calculator watch and even under earth conditions the best pilots were having trouble landing that thing. Mirrors there reflecting lasers we fire from earth does prove we've been there in some capacity tho. I can see Q going with the "disinfo is necessary" angle on that answer simply to keep anons more focused on important shit than how we scammed the russians into spending a shitload of money on a space race that eventually got filmed on a hollywood sound stage.
Weird pictures with crosshairs behind rocks?
Van Allen radiation belt?
Couldn't land the thing in earth conditions but somehow did it perfectly under the moons'?
It's been a while since I've gone down that rabbit hole, but I still have my doubts.
I can see why Q would disconnect from the whole line of thinking. If 99.9% of the population thinks the earth is a ball, it does not matter if it IS a ball. If you buck against pervasive and deeply held beliefs you will bring ridicule down on your head. Whether the belief is true or false doesn't matter.
If the flat-earthers had continued to align themselves heavily with Q, we all KNOW what would have happened. The media would have deliberately conflated Q with "flat earth", the 99.9% would have gone into ridicule mode, and no new eyes would ever see Q posts. Because they would have been inoculated against Q by the idea that Q = flat earth. So it HAD to stop, and that is also why I supported removing flat earth posts from Q forums.
That debate is no doubt coming -along with a million others - but it's not at ALL for now. We have bigger fish to fry and need to keep our focus.
Q had to say no to that whether it is round or a flat circle or whatever it is. Media would've had a field day.
He could've simply ignored the question. He would get literally thousands at a time on each of his posts. If he thought the earth was flat he would have either said so or just ignored the question entirely. And I don't agree with the premise that Q was worried about his MSM reputation anyway.
True - there is no way around it. This isn't the time to come along and challenge every single thing we've been indoctrinated in that may turn out to be false later on. We have one thing to direct our attention to, and that is exposing the Satanist Cabal and their network.
All we needed were math calculations, vehicles with enough fuel, and people with enough balls. We had all of those. No one said it was easy or low risk.
You will have to explain to me how the astronauts survived lethal levels of radiation and lived long happy lives. NASA freely admits it doesn't have radiation shielding technology to go to the moon today, but we had it like 60 years ago? If you've actually looked into the stories of the Apollo missions, they are clearly a load of shit. There are literally hundreds of inconsistencies and outright inaccuracies from astronaut interviews.
Go here and look at these 'vehicles' that they claim made the journey. Look at that Soviet garbage heap and our Apollo ships. They look like garbage welded together in someone's back yard. These are not the most technically advanced craft of all time. How absurd.
http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-2/
The footage from the ISS is faked, too, by the way.
You are a flaming moron.
Read about these topics before spouting so much bullshit...
https://www.space.com/33948-van-allen-radiation-belts.html
You will just have to wait until you can buy a ticket on one of Elon's Starships before you are convinced that space travel can and does happen. They shield on board computers against radiation all the time. Explorers are indeed nutty enough to take such risks. Scaled to the more modern times, a trip to the Moon in the late 60's was on the level of a trip to Antarctica during the Heroic Age from 1895-1917.
What really gets me is the Van Allan Radiation belt. I was reading that it would fry any living organic material that passes through it without massive shielding. And that all the radiation in space would give you cancer if you were to survive. Buzz and the boys didnt get cancer and didnt get cooked. They went there with shielding of basically tin foil. Oh well it could be true or faked. I really dont know.
I'm incapable of believing the moon landings were faked. In elementary and middle school we were obsessed with the space program and NASA, and I remember watching Neil Armstrong step foot on the moon live.
Two years ago I visited the museum in Huntsville and saw the huge exhibit covering the Apollo program. It's worth the trip.
The people involved with the Apollo program didn't have supercomputers but they had slide rules and pencils. They were brilliant and pushed 1960's technology to the limit.
I curse every president and nasa administrator who has neglected our push beyond our planet.
I hope the Great Awakening moves humanity into space.
It would have been more difficult to produce a believable hoax than to just land on the Moon. All a Moon landing is is some math equations, some vehicles capable of performing what the equations model, and some people with super balls to drive those vehicles where they need to go.
And why would the USSR congratulate us and admit defeat in the race to the moon. They were tracking Apollo on its way to the moon with their own instruments.
Exactly.
This is one of the "deboonkers" favorite tropes, and it's absolutely retarded just on the face of it, but I still hear it more than just about any other argument...
Don't take my word for it. If the Apollo missions actually happened, they left mirrors on the surface at the landing sites. You can fire a laser at them and get a return signal. Or, you can not call people names who tell you that they happened and take their word for it.
That's another really dumb trope. Trust me, I've heard them all. The truth is that you don't need mirrors at all to bounce a laser, they were doing it before the moon missions allegedly happened.
And people tell me that "I can shoot the laser." Yeah, I'm just going to point my laser at what, a one-square-meter mirror on the surface of the MOON to get a signal back... who even comes up with this shit.
Watch "Apollo 13" the scene where they show him imagining landing on the Moon. There was a stage set faked Moon landing. That was clearly faked. Compare with actual Apollo footage.
Programming is very hard to break. Look at OP - who told him everything he knows about the earth and what's around it? Government entities who lie about everything, who admit lying about everything, and we've caught them.
I don't really think this is the right time for this particular debate at ALL, just pointing out that there IS plenty of evidence (and I've seen it) that all space footage is artificial and/or deceptively altered, and OP doesn't seem to even know that much. It's really easy to find - I have no interest in the subject at this point, but even I have seen it.
Those who tell you what you must believe are not arbiters of truth. We KNOW that much. OP might mean well, but he's interjecting evidence of his own mind control into the argument.
As for GhostEzra, I am sure everyone has noticed that some people adopt Q's way of speaking? You've all seen that go on HERE! Maybe a bit silly but it doesn't mean they are necessarily nefarious.
You can literally conduct experiments on the ground. The ancient Greeks did. It isn't some government conspiracy that the Earth is round.
Yes, you can conduct experiments on the ground. I have seen a few. Edited to add: you know that there are now cameras that can pick up great detail at enormous distances? Our friends who were into this whole thing took one on a mutual vacation to Lake Tahoe, which is 22 miles in length.
On a cool day of no wind turbulence on that lake you can clearly see - from ground level - a ground level fixed point at the opposite end of the lake. Impossible.
You probably have places in your vicinity that this can be duplicated. I've also seen from San Diego to the port of Long Beach.
There's also Salton Sea. That one I have NOT yet seen - but do have an interest in due to its massive size. It's really an ideal candidate. A lot of people have recorded their efforts. Youtube purged a lot of those videos, according to these same friends of ours, but I believe bitchute still has a large number.
hahaha you are a flat earther? I would advise against taking a cruse, ya mught fall off the edge.