Ron Paul is not exactly correct in this case. Science has ALWAYS been controlled by politics and money. That doesn't mean we have made no progress in science. On the contrary we have made great progress using the SM. It would be more accurate to say it would be BETTER science if we lost our Luciferian influencers, but the same could be said for all areas of the human experience.
Newton was almost certainly a Luciferian. He was massively funded by the bankers. So was DaVinci, and many others you might think of as being founders of science. I don't know about Galileo, but that is not relevant to my point. My point was not that every single piece of what we now call science was funded by the DS, but that in general, evidence suggests that our inquiries into the truth of things have been guided by "the money lenders" for centuries, possibly millennia. They are opportunists. They take advantage of others work and use it for their goals, and they do it by subvert methods using as the primary motivator those things that people need to survive (or think they do, i.e. sex, power, money).
Today IS a whole new level, but only because it is more obvious to the masses. I think that has to do more with the "information age" than anything else. It could also be because the Luciferians are in their end game.
The whole world will be better. Hopefully, that is a job in progress
That hope is how I get through the day. We shall see.
That's in number 1. Money drives our path of inquiry, and it drives not looking at others work.
Ron Paul and others have said that when politics and money control science, it will cease to be science.
Ron Paul is not exactly correct in this case. Science has ALWAYS been controlled by politics and money. That doesn't mean we have made no progress in science. On the contrary we have made great progress using the SM. It would be more accurate to say it would be BETTER science if we lost our Luciferian influencers, but the same could be said for all areas of the human experience.
I'm not aware of any government or institutional grants that helped Newton figure out gravity. Galileo was imprisoned for his ideas.
I don't agree it was always like this. It has been getting more and more corrupt over time. Today is a whole new level.
The whole world will be better. Hopefully, that is a job in progress.
Newton was almost certainly a Luciferian. He was massively funded by the bankers. So was DaVinci, and many others you might think of as being founders of science. I don't know about Galileo, but that is not relevant to my point. My point was not that every single piece of what we now call science was funded by the DS, but that in general, evidence suggests that our inquiries into the truth of things have been guided by "the money lenders" for centuries, possibly millennia. They are opportunists. They take advantage of others work and use it for their goals, and they do it by subvert methods using as the primary motivator those things that people need to survive (or think they do, i.e. sex, power, money).
Today IS a whole new level, but only because it is more obvious to the masses. I think that has to do more with the "information age" than anything else. It could also be because the Luciferians are in their end game.
That hope is how I get through the day. We shall see.