The "free speech" shills are easy for me at least to spot. they forget there is a vast difference between a right to speak and forcing others to listen to said speech.
GAW refusing to allow doomers to doom here is a case in point. This is "virtual property" and by virtue of it being property, its owners have vastly more authority than the visitor. For instance, if you owned a pub/bar, you wouldn't let a apoc preacher stay in your business if he screams in your customers ears about them all dying tomorrow, and the same principles apply here.
The "free speech" shills are easy for me at least to spot. they forget there is a vast difference between a right to speak and forcing others to listen to said speech.
GAW refusing to allow doomers to doom here is a case in point. This is "virtual property" and by virtue of it being property, its owners have vastly more authority than the visitor. For instance, if you owned a pub/bar, you wouldn't let a apoc preacher stay in your business if he screams in your customers ears about them all dying tomorrow, and the same principles apply here.