It's funny, I just went and did this myself not 10 minutes ago. USA is 1.8%. That includes all the suicides, poisonings, heart attacks, cardiac arrests, every single flu death, etc. And it doesn't include the many fabled asymptomatic carriers, who never knew they had the virus and thus didn't get tested.
The true survival rate is over 99%.
The true survival rate for people younger than 60 is 99.9%
Having looked at the data, and taking out all the cancer, auto accidents, suicides, flu, etc. deaths the real survival rate is > 99.9% across all age groups.
When you also take out vitamin D deficiency (a problem easier and cheaper to solve than masks) I would guess that survival rate probably goes above 99.99% or better across all age groups.
Under 60 (with Vitamin D) its probably better than 99.9999% (one in a million).
The mortality of SARS-cov-2 might be slightly exaggerated.
True, its easy to forget that,
However, Some people might have a hard time putting that into context.
Luckily we already have a baseline of what an acceptable death rate is its called annual flu deaths,
So that should be the benchmark we compare COVID-19 to to see if this is really as bad as its being stated.
And those figures show that covid is NOT a problem.
I was one of those (few) voices who was concerned about our flu death rates, and the fact that the vaccines seemed to make it worse.
I worked in a program for young kids in my church, and I was pretty adamant that if your kid has flu-like symptoms, please keep them home until they recover. It's just not nice to share the flu with everyone, especially when the symptoms are quite dangerous even for young folk.
It's funny, I just went and did this myself not 10 minutes ago. USA is 1.8%. That includes all the suicides, poisonings, heart attacks, cardiac arrests, every single flu death, etc. And it doesn't include the many fabled asymptomatic carriers, who never knew they had the virus and thus didn't get tested.
The true survival rate is over 99%.
The true survival rate for people younger than 60 is 99.9%
Having looked at the data, and taking out all the cancer, auto accidents, suicides, flu, etc. deaths the real survival rate is > 99.9% across all age groups.
When you also take out vitamin D deficiency (a problem easier and cheaper to solve than masks) I would guess that survival rate probably goes above 99.99% or better across all age groups.
Under 60 (with Vitamin D) its probably better than 99.9999% (one in a million).
The mortality of SARS-cov-2 might be slightly exaggerated.
When you are dealing with rates like 99%, you need to know the number of 9's.
99% = 1/100 die
99.9% = 1/1000 die
99.999% = 1/100,000 die
True, its easy to forget that, However, Some people might have a hard time putting that into context. Luckily we already have a baseline of what an acceptable death rate is its called annual flu deaths, So that should be the benchmark we compare COVID-19 to to see if this is really as bad as its being stated. And those figures show that covid is NOT a problem.
I was one of those (few) voices who was concerned about our flu death rates, and the fact that the vaccines seemed to make it worse.
I worked in a program for young kids in my church, and I was pretty adamant that if your kid has flu-like symptoms, please keep them home until they recover. It's just not nice to share the flu with everyone, especially when the symptoms are quite dangerous even for young folk.