Again, Mary Fanning's source was not positively identified. I suspect someone grabbed it from a tap off of the wired infrastructure at a few locations or a wireless sniff of multiple SSIDs at those locations.
It's not a deflection, because there's zero info those IPs were contacted by the voting machines themselves.
And it's unclear what the tabulation / reporting machines were permitted to connect to, that would be in the system security plan submitted to the FEC and/or CISA. External connectivity absolutely could be allowed.
Regardless of that, it is public knowledge that Dominion, Scytl, and Edison Research all used Amazon Web Services as part of their infrastructure. I personally confirmed that better than 75% of the IPs attributed to "Chinese hackers" were in reality, VMs that are part of AWS running in Tencent's cloud.
(Two notes:
I sampled 75% and found nothing attributable to overt nation-state hacking, not I looked at 100% and 75% was 'clean'- I'm not implying 25% was malicious.
If we want to fix this going forward, the law needs to be changed to treat voter data the same as CUI, only reviewable by vetted US Citizens and hosted in the US on a FEDRAMP High-compliant system.)
All of it together discounts the Fanning dump, it's not smoking-gun stuff, but a haystack of uncorrelated data. The key to what you're stating is tying the external communication to a voting machine while "in service", which would be the violation. The ability to correlate that in the Fanning data is lacking.
You did a better job addressing Fanning's data than anything I have seen in the MSM. They just went for the smear job when they could have looked so much better by stating some of the info you have.
Thanks. I think had she ran some of that data past someone who did any real computer crimes investigation in the first place, maybe it wouldn't have been entirely dismissed as crackpot.
Again, Mary Fanning's source was not positively identified. I suspect someone grabbed it from a tap off of the wired infrastructure at a few locations or a wireless sniff of multiple SSIDs at those locations.
It's not a deflection, because there's zero info those IPs were contacted by the voting machines themselves.
And it's unclear what the tabulation / reporting machines were permitted to connect to, that would be in the system security plan submitted to the FEC and/or CISA. External connectivity absolutely could be allowed.
Regardless of that, it is public knowledge that Dominion, Scytl, and Edison Research all used Amazon Web Services as part of their infrastructure. I personally confirmed that better than 75% of the IPs attributed to "Chinese hackers" were in reality, VMs that are part of AWS running in Tencent's cloud.
(Two notes:
I sampled 75% and found nothing attributable to overt nation-state hacking, not I looked at 100% and 75% was 'clean'- I'm not implying 25% was malicious.
If we want to fix this going forward, the law needs to be changed to treat voter data the same as CUI, only reviewable by vetted US Citizens and hosted in the US on a FEDRAMP High-compliant system.)
All of it together discounts the Fanning dump, it's not smoking-gun stuff, but a haystack of uncorrelated data. The key to what you're stating is tying the external communication to a voting machine while "in service", which would be the violation. The ability to correlate that in the Fanning data is lacking.
Didn't OIG have several violations written up on Elections support organizations for not complying with standards?
I thought I read something about that on oversight.gov.
Sorry...it was an OIG Report on the EAC. Here's a post I did with the link.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrE5XJ1/a-little-more-about-the-election/c/
I remember that thread. It was a really good dig.
You did a better job addressing Fanning's data than anything I have seen in the MSM. They just went for the smear job when they could have looked so much better by stating some of the info you have.
Thanks. I think had she ran some of that data past someone who did any real computer crimes investigation in the first place, maybe it wouldn't have been entirely dismissed as crackpot.