Well wouldn't SCOTUS have to step in at that point? I dont think impeached if it is shown he was an illegally elected president. I think it would just be a revote conducted by the military to confirm whether that was the case or not?
I mean in terms of the Dems if they really had 81 million, well prove it and do it again, this time with I.D.'s and no time to plan ahead because they are in the dark entirely.
STOP STOP AND FKN STOP. If it is proven Trump won no revote is necessary and Biden will be removed for the criminal he is. You people talking about revote just kill me. You do not have to revote when they have the original votes already.
I mean this literally makes no sense. half the people on this page believe the constitution is for a defunct corporation and the other half holds on like the majority of our rights haven't been trampled and continued to be trampled on by a government that has not abided by it since the civil war. :)))))))))))))
Section 11 of the Law of War is entitled “Military Occupation,” not “Military Occupation on Foreign Soil.”
It’s bound by numerous laws and treaties including most famously the Geneva Convention - and this document describes the DoD conduct that should, in their opinion, pass legal muster in an international court.
DC is its own entity. It WAS occupying the constitutional US. So the War Manual is spot on. Do you think DC is part of the US? London part of Great Britain? Vatican part of Italy?
Well wouldn't SCOTUS have to step in at that point? I dont think impeached if it is shown he was an illegally elected president. I think it would just be a revote conducted by the military to confirm whether that was the case or not?
I mean in terms of the Dems if they really had 81 million, well prove it and do it again, this time with I.D.'s and no time to plan ahead because they are in the dark entirely.
STOP STOP AND FKN STOP. If it is proven Trump won no revote is necessary and Biden will be removed for the criminal he is. You people talking about revote just kill me. You do not have to revote when they have the original votes already.
I mean sure, but again wouldn't the dems just say that was all made up etc? Why wouldn't we want a re-vote WITH voter ID?
They dont get to have a say in that eventuality
SCOTIS wouldn’t step in. They’ve had chances to set things right but haven’t. They’ve stepped in ? ? and they won’t get the smell off their shoes.
Please cite the clause where it discusses wars on foreign soil. This is a constant theme of yours and I sure don’t see it within this guidance.
I mean this literally makes no sense. half the people on this page believe the constitution is for a defunct corporation and the other half holds on like the majority of our rights haven't been trampled and continued to be trampled on by a government that has not abided by it since the civil war. :)))))))))))))
What constitution?
The Law of War. It’s the only way the .mil could get involved.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Section 11 of the Law of War is entitled “Military Occupation,” not “Military Occupation on Foreign Soil.”
It’s bound by numerous laws and treaties including most famously the Geneva Convention - and this document describes the DoD conduct that should, in their opinion, pass legal muster in an international court.
There are TONS of rules for this sort of thing.
I thought D.C. is considered foreign entity tho?
DC is its own entity. It WAS occupying the constitutional US. So the War Manual is spot on. Do you think DC is part of the US? London part of Great Britain? Vatican part of Italy?