Jovan has talked in length about the information below.
This is from page 10 from the link above off the CISA.gov website:
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot style codes Most ballots have style codes (i.e. timing marks, code channels, QR codes, etc.) that are validated by the voting machines. Generally, these are in a proprietary format and can only be interpreted by a specific type of voting machine. If the codes are not recognized by the equipment, the ballot is rejected by the voting machine and manually reviewed by the election official.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot paper specifications
Most ballots must be printed on a specific type of paper. If the ballot is printed on paper that does not match the specifications (i.e. length, paper weight, opacity, etc.), the voting machine will reject the ballot.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot watermarks Some voting systems and some states implement watermarks to be printed on the ballot that are specific to an election or designate it as being printed by an approved printing authority providing a visual cue that the ballot is authentic.
remember all the videos and pictures of humvees rolling into select cities before the election? never saw them again, except for DC. they just disappeared into these places. and we never saw pictures or videos of them doing anything. no major checkpoints or barricades or whatever you would think they would be doing. very brief blurb of interest on the internet, and it just kind of faded away.
my take is that the military was tasked with verifying election security, and trump had to trust them to not be corrupted and to do what they are supposed to do. has to be independent type thing. Not only will the eyes of the world be on US, they have the weight of history on their shoulders. Whatever happens will be monday morning quarter backed for centuries.
gonna be interesting if the real ballots did have actual counterfeit protection on them.
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming is not just a catchphrase! Q
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa-mail-in-voting-infrastructure-risk-assessment_508.pdf
Jovan has talked in length about the information below. This is from page 10 from the link above off the CISA.gov website:
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot style codes Most ballots have style codes (i.e. timing marks, code channels, QR codes, etc.) that are validated by the voting machines. Generally, these are in a proprietary format and can only be interpreted by a specific type of voting machine. If the codes are not recognized by the equipment, the ballot is rejected by the voting machine and manually reviewed by the election official.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot paper specifications Most ballots must be printed on a specific type of paper. If the ballot is printed on paper that does not match the specifications (i.e. length, paper weight, opacity, etc.), the voting machine will reject the ballot.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot watermarks Some voting systems and some states implement watermarks to be printed on the ballot that are specific to an election or designate it as being printed by an approved printing authority providing a visual cue that the ballot is authentic.
remember all the videos and pictures of humvees rolling into select cities before the election? never saw them again, except for DC. they just disappeared into these places. and we never saw pictures or videos of them doing anything. no major checkpoints or barricades or whatever you would think they would be doing. very brief blurb of interest on the internet, and it just kind of faded away.
my take is that the military was tasked with verifying election security, and trump had to trust them to not be corrupted and to do what they are supposed to do. has to be independent type thing. Not only will the eyes of the world be on US, they have the weight of history on their shoulders. Whatever happens will be monday morning quarter backed for centuries.
this has to go down squeaky clean.