Ok. Next, do “who defines illegal speech?”
The question is, is there such a thing as illegal speech?
Only a call to action is legally considered illegal if the action called to us itself illegal.
We must always be very careful to use the right language when it comes to laws.
I very much disagree in changing 230, because as someone who runs a lot of websites, I'd have to rethink a lot of user generated content to make sure I wasn't at legal risk. It would hurt small tech/alt tech as much as big tech, including making something like Gab cost prohibitive to operate.
I think what we really need is more privacy and other reforms tbh. I think antitrust issues are very fair game against some of the large tech companies because they have used their monopoly to stifle competition.
Ok. Next, do “who defines illegal speech?” The question is, is there such a thing as illegal speech? Only a call to action is legally considered illegal if the action called to us itself illegal. We must always be very careful to use the right language when it comes to laws.
I very much disagree in changing 230, because as someone who runs a lot of websites, I'd have to rethink a lot of user generated content to make sure I wasn't at legal risk. It would hurt small tech/alt tech as much as big tech, including making something like Gab cost prohibitive to operate.
I think what we really need is more privacy and other reforms tbh. I think antitrust issues are very fair game against some of the large tech companies because they have used their monopoly to stifle competition.