It was one of the first things in the linked article. Unnecessarily prominent, as many here are pointing out. Another quote from the article questions their standards, though: "the mom was also 7 months pregnant with a special needs child." An aggressively early diagnosis? Seems like they'll have to wait a bit for a good fact-check.
It was one of the first things in the linked article. Unnecessarily prominent, as many here are pointing out. Another quote from the article questions their standards, though: "the mom was also 7 months pregnant with a special needs child." An aggressively early diagnosis? Seems like they'll have to wait a bit for a good fact-check.