Are you suggesting coronavirus symptoms are actually 5g?

5g may or may not be dangerous as implemented. Each wavelength of light has different interactions with the molecules of the body. In the case of 4g or 5g those interactions are minimal. These wavelengths only cause a very small vibration. They have zero capacity to ionize any molecules (insufficient energy to be absorbed, i.e. kick an electron into a higher orbit and/or cause a bond to break).

Any lower frequency is the same (radio, etc.). There just isn't enough energy to do anything but cause a very small vibration. 5g has a slightly more effect than 4g, though it is the same effect. This vibration is really just heat, or energy added to the system. It can do something, but its not much, and its not generally harmful. Indeed our bodies are being bombarded by such photons constantly, even in a completely preindustrial world (from the sun/universe in general).

5g needs to be tested more for sure. It may cause problems on human health. It may not. There is nothing wrong with the 5g frequency on the body (like I said, we get hit with them all the time and have for all of our lives, all life for all of time in fact). There may however be a problem with the intensity (photons per second) of the current implementation of 5g. I only say that because it has not be tested enough, not because I think it is likely to be true.

But to suggest that 5g is a more likely culprit than a virus we know existed in another form (SARS-cov-1) and has many other similar viral brethren is kinda ridiculous without really, really good evidence. Having a great deal of knowledge about both viruses and photons, and having looked extensively, I have found no credible evidence for such an idea.

That doesn't mean I would ignore any evidence anyone has to provide though. I am only armed with better knowledge, and better capability from that knowledge to dismiss crap. That doesn't make me infallible or all knowing (far from it on both counts).

Maybe.

I think it is more likely that we just didn't have a handle on it. It came at a time when people are most vitamin D deficient (beginning of spring) and hit a population that is least likely to get sun, and most likely to die from it anyways. They were then all thrown in the same room together in many states. This created a huge spike in deaths, all old, creating both a fear of the virus, and a "social responsibility to protect the vulnerable."

I doubt the virus has changed all that much since it first came here (if at all on the broad scale). I think many of the "deaths" in December were flu (it was flu season which was apparently cured) I am pretty sure there were also covid deaths, but that's what happens when you take real data showing how to cure the disease and call it fake news. Its also what happens when you weaken immune systems with constant disinfectant, and promote pneumonia by wearing masks. I am also suspicious that the death data itself may actually be fraudulent.

On Dec. 14th with 2.5 weeks left the death data was about 5% higher than the previous year. This is a meaningful increase, but not a big deal. They said the CDC data was about a week behind (how long it takes to get all the death certificates) so add another week and its about 6% higher. Then on Jan 8th (when the data should have been caught up) it was about 8% higher. Ok, so that's where it should have been, or at least close enough. But NOW its 16% higher. So we went from 8% higher on Jan. 8th to 16% higher now. This has me suspicious Dominion is counting death certificates.

So I really doubt any of this has to do with mutations. Mutations (in the way they are being reported) are a scare tactic. They ignore a lot of real biology. Most viral mutations will be trivial or will deleterious to the virus (won't spread e.g.). Viruses don't really "get weaker" in the short time this virus has been among us. It's all disinformation, intentional or otherwise.

I suggest to not overcomplicate it with theories. All data seems to suggest the following:

The virus is (and always has been) less harmful than they say. Vitamin D and zinc (and other vitamins and minerals) are the best defense against it. HCQ and Ivermectin are great treatments. Ventilators may kill you and will never help you. Masks and disinfectants do more harm than good. Vaccines will not help and likely are more harmful than the virus if the above is followed.

look up Placebo side effects for every drug that received FDA approval

Thousands of people have died (and that's just the ones in the official data). Hundreds of thousands have experienced severe reactions (again, at a minimum). These severe reactions include Bell's Palsy, anaphylactic shock, coma, full paralysis, partial paralysis, blood clots (including many fatalities), blindness, the list goes on and on. I recommend you look at the data before suggesting "placebo side effects." These are not placebo. No other vaccine has had this severe reaction since Gates experiments in 3rd world countries (which admittedly were worse).

I do not know anyone who has died from the vaccine. I don't even know anyone who has had a serious side effect. I don't know many people who have gotten the vaccine, so the sample size is very small.

Either White Hats are in control (everything) or God Help us.

The white hats almost certainly didn't steal the election from themselves. Instead they most likely gave the DS enough rope to hang themselves. I think that is also the case with CV and the vaccines. Being in control on a top level doesn't mean being in control of the minutia. Sometimes you have to allow people to do bad things for the greater good.

This is a war for the planet. Allowing some bad people to kill a few thousand people with a vaccine that prevents a world wide kinetic war that kills millions or billions or destroys the entire planet for all eternity? I'd call that a necessary allowance of evil.

It is possible MOST of those (not all) that are dying from the vaccines would be even more likely to die from the virus. Again, when confronted with two options, both which lead to death, how do you choose between them? You choose the lesser of two evils. Sometimes that is the only choice. When those differences are extreme (as suggested above) its a no brainer.

Never forget we are in the war to end all wars. Innocent people die in war. That is simply how it is.