There is something I can’t quite reconcile. Sidney says (not for the first time) that there was a complete failure in EVERY branch of the government to secure the election. Executive included. In this interview she says she’s very disappointed in Trump’s failure to act, and to tell his bad advisors to piss off.
Lin Wood, on the other hand, has continued to note that he is fully loyal to Trump, and trusts Trump. But he and Sidney work together. He praises Flynn who, as far as I can tell, is also disappointed in Trump’s response to their meeting but hasn’t called it out as firmly as Sidney.
Then you throw in Patrick Byrne, who runs in the same circle. He wrote their story, Sidney corroborates it, but he seems to have a different take too.
Sidney Powell is heading up a PAC and Trump cannot have affiliation with it. These two warriors are on different teams of the same side with arrows aligned towards the same enemies.
You have literally fallen for the clickbait headlines that make that assertion.
You are ignorant to the truth. She actually says in her court filing that no reasonable person would believe she was stating anything beyond a legal opinion, in which SHE WHOLEHEARTEDLY BELIEVES, that she intends to prove AS FACT in a court of law.
But go ahead and keep sucking that doomer dick.
Some people like the taste....
I'm sure they are not part of and privy to the intricacies of the plan. Potus knew he had to let it play out and from their perspective he was being inactive...
There is something I can’t quite reconcile. Sidney says (not for the first time) that there was a complete failure in EVERY branch of the government to secure the election. Executive included. In this interview she says she’s very disappointed in Trump’s failure to act, and to tell his bad advisors to piss off.
Lin Wood, on the other hand, has continued to note that he is fully loyal to Trump, and trusts Trump. But he and Sidney work together. He praises Flynn who, as far as I can tell, is also disappointed in Trump’s response to their meeting but hasn’t called it out as firmly as Sidney.
Then you throw in Patrick Byrne, who runs in the same circle. He wrote their story, Sidney corroborates it, but he seems to have a different take too.
I just don’t know what to make of it all.
Sidney Powell is heading up a PAC and Trump cannot have affiliation with it. These two warriors are on different teams of the same side with arrows aligned towards the same enemies.
Sidney discusses this topic at time mark 22:35 in the following pod cast (her interview starts at 14:20) https://www.iheart.com/podcast/459-ken-matthews-28220304/episode/the-ken-matthews-show-hour-1-80337163/
she's literally saying in court she made everything up.
You have literally fallen for the clickbait headlines that make that assertion.
You are ignorant to the truth. She actually says in her court filing that no reasonable person would believe she was stating anything beyond a legal opinion, in which SHE WHOLEHEARTEDLY BELIEVES, that she intends to prove AS FACT in a court of law.
But go ahead and keep sucking that doomer dick. Some people like the taste....
Did you watch the Dinesh D'Souza interview with her? She says the exact opposite.
?
Bad advisor in WH Exec branch = Pence??
If that's true, I agree...
I'm sure they are not part of and privy to the intricacies of the plan. Potus knew he had to let it play out and from their perspective he was being inactive...