No. Look at before 1810, when the first London banker set up shop here and started manipulating silver to separate the wealth (plebs had silver, bankers had gold). This manipulation really took off in 1873 with the coin act where silver was divorced from money (the 5000 years before that they were both always money).
By 1913 silver had already been massively devalued, used as a market and economy manipulation tool: their PRIMARY manipulation tool.
The real silver:gold ratio is, throughout all of history (prior to 1810) about 10:1 with small variation. That was before silver took front and center in our technology. Its real value now relative to gold might even be better than that.
Gold is currently undervalued. Silver is many times worse.
No. Look at before 1810, when the first London banker set up shop here and started manipulating silver to separate the wealth (plebs had silver, bankers had gold). This manipulation really took off in 1873 with the coin act where silver was divorced from money (the 5000 years before that they were both always money).
By 1913 silver had already been massively devalued, used as a market and economy manipulation tool: their PRIMARY manipulation tool.
The real silver:gold ratio is, throughout all of history (prior to 1810) about 10:1 with small variation. That was before silver took front and center in our technology. Its real value now relative to gold might even be better than that.
Gold is currently undervalued. Silver is many times worse.
Bingo. Industrialistsay swap silver for other alternatives but the cutting edge will still need silver as it's the most conductive metal.
Either way, keep stacking!