Many are asking about what the deal is with Trump and the vaccine. Here's a take that makes sense to me, maybe it will to you.
(media.greatawakening.win)
?? Theory ??
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (182)
sorted by:
Fuck it. I have been watching GA for many months, and this topic has prompted me to become a handshake profile, so to speak. I'm usually not one to comment, because I am more of a doer with my actions--hence the 'fuck it".
Anyway, my theory is simple, and similar to what other fine-minded Anons have said: Trump needed to take away their strategic shut-down advantage by hurrying the vax. I think that the vax all along was being developed for nefarious reasons, so I think BG (Bill G) said, "Thanks, Trump, we'll just inject people with this crap sooner than later." I do not think Trump knew the extent of BG's eugenist philosophy, but even if he did, the path of the fast vaxx was better than a long lock-down and then a crap vaxx. But there is another layer...
Trump would certainly know by now all about BG (I actually think he has always known, and the fast-vaxx was a lesser evil) so why would he say to get the vaxx? Sadly, in war there will be casualties. I think Trump has always needed to avoid being labeled as the guy who said "no" to the vaxx, even if it means people getting it and suffering... it would be too difficult to overcome that branding of being the "anti'vaxx 'former' Pres" . Personally, I think his heart breaks every time he thinks about people getting the vaxx, and the closest he can come to saying "don't get it" is to promote choice, and have others like Gen Flynn speak out (I don't have sauce on that, but thought I had seen it on this board).
But all of this leads to a bigger question: if white hats are in charge of this movie, AND if the vaxx is evil, then why would white hats allow it to continue? Fuck if I know. But my theory for what it's worth is this: wh are still not in full control, meaning that there are "doomsday" failsafes that they need to keep in mind... and as they attack the dark side, they are trying to neutralize the failsafes. Yes, I realize "failsafe" concept is usally good... I mean "safe" is good. But in this case, the bad guys have their own failsafes to ensure what they think is good will happen.
The next question, then, is: When will the wh's decide that they have done as much as they can do, and it's time to let the chips fall where they may? And that, my Frens, is where I stop because I refuse to be a datefag : )