"My preliminary MI election analysis is now formally public, filed in a court of Law. I will post it on YouTube shortly with verbal explanation. It is devastating. So now, when people say, "There is no legal evidence of election fraud." They are simply incorrect. Legal. Court. Documents. My analysis for Matt DePerno, in the nationally famous Antrim case. Boom."
I will link his video when he posts it.
Hope he’s right. Can anyone provide some background on Dr. Frank versus some of the people doing analyses back before January 20th? And hopefully these cases don’t run into being dismissed on technicalities like standing or laches.