It's so sad that so many people on what is ostensibly a Q research forum are defending a scam artist who claims to have spoken with Q. Jesus Christ, there needs to be a mandatory IQ test for registering on this site and an age limit of 45 so the retarded boomers stop shitting the place up.
Maybe the age limit should be that no one UNDER 45 be allowed, you think? Because obviously, good manners and proper language were both lost on most of that age group along with respect for other people and their opinions. Sounds suspicious.... I think I smell a liberal. Oh, and it's a bit presumptuous for one to assume that another has a "low IQ" or is a "retarded boomer" if over the age of 45.
Statistics prove that the generational gap has proved decided drop in the intelligence quotient of the millennials.
What's even funnier is that the Boomer-hater person/bot calling themselves "thefacesitter" (sounds kinky - LOL) doesn't even know what age the Boomer generation is. The low end of Boomers were born in 1964 (age 56) and the high end was born in 1946 (age 75), so their proposed age cut-off of 45 doesn't even make sense (age 45 is a mid-range Gen-Xer).
All of the Q and Trump supporters that I know are either Gen-X or Boomer ages. I don't know ANY Millennials who voted for Trump (either time) or any who believe in Q.
Not that I'm trying to get involved in your ridiculous argument.... But...Boomers RAISED the "awful millennials"....
So.... Time to look in the mirror. ??
Did I say "awful millennials"? No I didn't. There are some quite fine upstanding ones. But if the person that posted the segment using the Lords name in vain and declaring anyone over 45 to be an imbecile, thinks they have any higher of an IQ then I believe they are in for a very rude awakening
It's so sad that so many people on what is ostensibly a Q research forum are defending a scam artist who claims to have spoken with Q. Jesus Christ, there needs to be a mandatory IQ test for registering on this site and an age limit of 45 so the retarded boomers stop shitting the place up.
Maybe the age limit should be that no one UNDER 45 be allowed, you think? Because obviously, good manners and proper language were both lost on most of that age group along with respect for other people and their opinions. Sounds suspicious.... I think I smell a liberal. Oh, and it's a bit presumptuous for one to assume that another has a "low IQ" or is a "retarded boomer" if over the age of 45. Statistics prove that the generational gap has proved decided drop in the intelligence quotient of the millennials.
What's even funnier is that the Boomer-hater person/bot calling themselves "thefacesitter" (sounds kinky - LOL) doesn't even know what age the Boomer generation is. The low end of Boomers were born in 1964 (age 56) and the high end was born in 1946 (age 75), so their proposed age cut-off of 45 doesn't even make sense (age 45 is a mid-range Gen-Xer).
All of the Q and Trump supporters that I know are either Gen-X or Boomer ages. I don't know ANY Millennials who voted for Trump (either time) or any who believe in Q.
Not that I'm trying to get involved in your ridiculous argument.... But...Boomers RAISED the "awful millennials".... So.... Time to look in the mirror. ??
Did I say "awful millennials"? No I didn't. There are some quite fine upstanding ones. But if the person that posted the segment using the Lords name in vain and declaring anyone over 45 to be an imbecile, thinks they have any higher of an IQ then I believe they are in for a very rude awakening