1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
by Quelle
-3
thefacesitter -3 points ago +5 / -8

Law of war manual theory is a massive red herring. It's completely built on posts that are cherrypicked out of context.

by Quelle
10
thefacesitter 10 points ago +11 / -1

Indicted on 11.3, not arrested. The indictment was sealed: https://qanon.pub/?#1518

1
thefacesitter 1 point ago +1 / -0

"There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration." - Pompeo on Nov. 10.

"Just as we have with other horrible regimes, like the one in China, the Trump administrations will look to this as it is, not as we wish it to be." - Pompeo on Jan. 12 when asked about how the US should deal with the Iranians.

2
thefacesitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Durham."

Q

They told us all the way back on Nov. 12 what their counter-move would be. We just didn't think they would be crazy enough to do it AFTER losing the WH.

2
thefacesitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Including a helicopter that was shot down in SA with some important people on it trying to flee.

2
thefacesitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Corona could mean anything. You're spinning a wild theory out of almost nothing.

10
thefacesitter 10 points ago +10 / -0

Please tell me it's coming soon. I know based on Q post 4952 that Durham is supposed to trigger the return of the WH to Trump but I'm losing my mind waiting for it.

by Restore
4
thefacesitter 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://media.greatawakening.win/post/b0zK5P6q.jpeg

Scavino tweeted this on March 12th. There is some kind "show" going on that I assume is going to culminate in Durham dropping the hammer.

1
thefacesitter 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think the people peddling red herring theories like "The corporation of the united states is bankrupt and Trump is being inaugurated on March 4th" as well as the DoD Law of War Manual bullshit are also disruption shills. Whenever I've engaged with them and linked Q posts that utterly debunk these nonsensical theories, they've responded with wild personal attacks and just acted totally irrational.

1
thefacesitter 1 point ago +1 / -0

We learned just yesterday that Durham has been presenting evidence to a grand jury in order to explore criminal charges. We also were told by Q in his second-to-last post that Durham would be the solution. We also saw a Trump tweet all the back in Dec. 23 straight up talking about a special counsel investigating the voter fraud. You should be able to piece that all together, unless you yourself are a disruption shill.

-3
thefacesitter -3 points ago +1 / -4

I feel so bad for Majic the schizo lunatic and all of you mindless, unthinking herd animals duped by his BS. This is another major red herring, just like the "Corporation of the United States" nonsense that had you morons thinking Trump was going to be inaugurated on March 4th.

11.3, 11.6, and 11.11 are all dates you utter fools.

11.3 and 11.6 are when Podesta and Huma were indicted: https://qanon.pub/?q=commitment#1518

11.11 is the date Trump met with Putin:

https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#2396

https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#2288 ("days prior")

https://qanon.pub/?q=11.11#1357 ("post midterms" which were on Nov. 6)

For reasons undisclosed, we needed to secure a true senate majority before Trump's meeting with Putin on Nov. 11.

https://qanon.pub/?q=Securing%20the%20SENATE%20

https://qanon.pub/?q=military%20planned

0
thefacesitter 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'll try and help you out one more time:

https://qanon.pub/?#1518

It doesn't get any more obvious than that. If you aren't able to see how stupid the DoD law of manual schizo nonsense is just from that post alone, then may God have mercy on your soul. I bet you were one of those "Corporation of the United States" idiots who thought Trump was gonna be inaugurated on March 4th, despite there not being a single shred of evidence in a single Q post supporting that theory.

0
thefacesitter 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well if you had clicked on the posts I linked you would quite clearly see that Q straight up CONFIRMS what I said, but just pulling interpretations out of thin air using those numbers out of context from the posts they appeared in makes much more sense, right?

-2
thefacesitter -2 points ago +3 / -5

How is this significant in any way? Do you think Q caused an earthquake in Haiti? What is the point of this?

2
thefacesitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's been pretty obvious since November when Q offers "Durham" as the solution to the election theft. Also, on December 23rd, Trump tweeted:

“After seeing the massive Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, I disagree with anyone that thinks a strong, fast, and fair Special Counsel is not needed, IMMEDIATELY. This was the most corrupt election in the history of our Country, and it must be closely examined!”

This is the exact same day Barr stepped down and was replaced by an acting AG who had written research papers into foreign interference in our elections. This guy was now in charge of special counsel investigations until the traitor Garland was confirmed in February.

3
thefacesitter 3 points ago +3 / -0

The intent is to never allow this to happen ever again and to restore the integrity of our elections. To achieve these goals, the investigation must be as complete as possible.

3
thefacesitter 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not how they want to do it. "It must be done right...it must be done according to the rule of law."

view more: Next ›