The subjects would need to get sick again. That's the rub - not the jab (although issues from the jab itself are being underreported), but getting sick again. And when these people get sick again, it will be difficult to pin the death or major issue on the jab because it happened so long ago. This is called plausible deniability.
As Dr Cahill points out, you can tell by autopsy because the pattern of damage is different if the injury is by viral infection versus by pathogenic priming autoimmune response.
The subjects would need to get sick again. That's the rub - not the jab (although issues from the jab itself are being underreported), but getting sick again. And when these people get sick again, it will be difficult to pin the death or major issue on the jab because it happened so long ago. This is called plausible deniability.
As Dr Cahill points out, you can tell by autopsy because the pattern of damage is different if the injury is by viral infection versus by pathogenic priming autoimmune response.
Will they do the autopsies?
Doubt it.