360
Comments (122)
sorted by:
35
scionkia 35 points ago +38 / -3

Frankly I find these type of 'predictions' about the MRNA vaccine to have about as much validity as the Imperial University projection of COVID deaths early in the plandemic. Anyone else find it odd how over the weekend we had three vax centers get, quite publicly, shut down due to adverse reactions? They could have hit the 'mute' button on these sites shutting down if they wanted to. I really believe both sides are getting played pretty heavy here while the war drums beat in Ukraine and the Pacific Islands.

25
Hodar 25 points ago +27 / -2

The exception here, is that this prediction is based upon what and how the human body replicates; not based on a mathematical model.

If I inject a rat with cancer, it's not a mathematical model that says the cancer will likely spread, and negatively affect the well-being of the rat.

It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA. Do you think this was without possible consequence?

8
MuckeyDuck 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA. Do you think this was without possible consequence?

I was under the impression that the antivaxers, the side I am on, believe that mRNA science, being a brand new thing, that the final results or affects are unknown.

What is unknown, is unknown to both vaxers and antivaxers. Why I'm an antivaxer is because I follow a "why take a change" way of thinking, which seem a common sense approach to me.

6
Newusertopumpmemes 6 points ago +6 / -0

According to vaxxers you are taking a chance by not getting it. No amount of logic will win these peóple over because it's not one person. No one can win over a mob but that doesn't mean the mob is right. Keep up the good fight!

9
Learna_Trade 9 points ago +9 / -0

I have become silent against the force of the stampede. People I dearly love are rushing to get the vaccine and then proudly bragging about it on social media. No questions asked, no objections allowed. I have come to realize I have as much chance of talking them out of getting vaccinated as talking someone out of their religion. The vaccine is their act of faith in their gods of science/ pharmaceuticals/ government/ media - the whole evil pantheon. When the earth shakes because of stampede, all you can do is get out of the way and watch the herd thunder by. And you definitely don’t want to join it.

5
Newusertopumpmemes 5 points ago +5 / -0

They want you to be silent. If you are fighting an information war, remaining silent is giving up. Share information any way you feel comfortable but don't go completely silent. Know which points you CAN bring up even if it's not specifically vaccines.

1
TrumpPosse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said

6
madmallard 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, until it's fully approved by the FDA, see ya!

4
marvinthehaggler 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fully FDA Approved but also producers are still firewalled from any liability.

Yeah, Imma sit this one out, thanks.

7
madmallard 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fully approved for "emergency use only", yeah lol

5
marvinthehaggler 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, I enjoy the comedy.

But what I meant was in response ot the "madmallard" comment, looking forward to some future when the vaccines are "fully approved". I see a lot of people now talking about that idea that this will happen in '22 or thereabouts.

It's still going to be a sh!tshow, a lie, and an obfuscation. A true bamboozling of those that can't pay attention.

This vaccine is, probably, poison. Don't take it. Regardless of whether it is "fully approved" by Santa, Jesus, The Easter Bunny, the Leprechauns, Ashtarte, Enki and Enlil, or Odin.

2
Lyonessrising 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that's a cool Pepe! 100% right about the see ya later w this unapproved "jab"..

4
Slyver 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's pretty much common knowledge that the mRNA vaccine MODIFIES your DNA.

Except the opposite is "common knowledge" for anyone who has studied and done actual experiments in cell and molecular biology.

Our cells are completely full of mRNA at all times. It is the primary path of information and function change in every cell of every lifeform on Earth. If mRNA that has made it to the cytosol modified DNA in any regular fashion life would cease to exist. In fact, life would have never existed in the first place.

It would be like if every software program on your computer was constantly rewriting the information on your hard drive at random. How long would your computer be able to function? Minutes? Seconds? Its virtually exactly the same thing.

2
AlecLeamas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Once again you are talking about naturally occurring mRNA. You have no idea how the synthetic mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to get around the normal cell responses in the body.

Since this is a technology that has never been used on humans before, and has resulted in 100% death of test animals in SARS-CoV-1 vaccine studies, prudence would indicate a wait-and-see approach is the best way to maximize one's chances.

See this article for instance: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna/

which says:

Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”

But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”

It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”

1
Slyver 1 point ago +1 / -0

That paper is strictly about the wild type virus. It has nothing to do with the mRNA being used in the vaccine. As I said, viruses can have the other machinery to make this happen. I am extremely surprised that this particular coronavirus has such machinery, and I am not certain that it does. I need to look very closely at that preprint article to make sure the science was done correctly and that their conclusions match the science (those things are far from certain, especially from a preprint article). Regardless, even if the virus does get written to DNA more often than the average virus, it is not something you can transfer over to the vaccine in any way.

"Synthetic" RNA doesn't really mean anything special. It was most likely made in a bacteria, such as E. coli or some other similar in vitro method. Molecules made in such procedures are identical to molecules made anywhere else. A molecule is a molecule. In the case of the mRNA in the vaccines they have modified bases that are signals used to reduce the probability that they will be degraded by the machinery that is designed to perform that function within a human cell. This is not anything new, but is instead using known biological tools that normal human mRNA already uses.

Is it possible it has other signals that help it get written to DNA? Sure, but the vaccines don't contain the OTHER mRNA that are necessary to make that process happen outside of a one in a quadrillion or so chance. I mean, maybe they do, but it is not one of the listed ingredients. Frankly, if they are putting in things and not listing them in the ingredients, there are much, MUCH better things they could add if they wanted to intentionally alter the DNA (such as all the CRISPR-cas9 associated tools).

1
Pedutoisacuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you postulate at the end actually happened to me once. Around a decade ago I got a computer virus that added exactly 1 byte to every file on the PC. The machine was instantly and completely crippled.

1
Slyver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, it is exactly a thing a computer virus that is designed to be completely destructive might do.

Interestingly, a biological virus can also write to DNA, but they have ADDITIONAL machinery that makes that happen; machinery that is not in the vaccines. Even in those cases it is very rare, but it can happen.

If it wasn't rare, even when it is set up to do it, the virus wouldn't have time to replicate, and on the broader scale no life could exist. Life, especially multicellular life, only works if its DNA is very rarely altered in any meaningful way.

3
LiquidRitz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plenty of known side effects though to justify not chancing it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
Zerbert1420 12 points ago +12 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Aa9Q8vUXNW2S/ This is an interview with Dr. Tenpenny. She’s been researching vaccines for 20 years and has put in over 40,000 hours of research into scientific literature. She’s one of the leading doctors delving into the studies. She’s not the only doctor making these claims. These mRNA vaccines have never been used on humans before and were only approved bc it was declared an emergency. In the animal trials, ALL of the animals ended up dying after being reintroduced to garden variety coronavirus. This is not a joke, and I wouldn’t be so quick to write it off as their are doctors out there dedicating their life to look into this.

7
Factfiler 7 points ago +7 / -0

Agree completely. This is what people don't understand. It's not about the vax now, it's about your body's response later to the virus if you are vaxxed. And few have the info that, as you said, ALL the animals tested in previous attempts at Corona virus vaxxes died. This is why they skipped animal trials with covid and went straight to vaxxing humans. People getting vaxxed are the trials.

1
45-4KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought dengvaxia used mRNA technology?

2
Jedo001 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a good Schill.

1
scionkia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Schill, been around long time. Critical thinking, watch, wait, absorb info instead of wild speculation.

1
Jedo001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok. Long-time Schill. You're glowing.

1
scionkia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow - checked your post history - no contributions - EVER. Useless commenter with nothing to add.

Look at this great one from the Schill

https://greatawakening.win/p/12i48eLDTY/look-at-this-circle-graph--updat/c/

2
R3tro 2 points ago +3 / -1

You can boil it all down to a vaccine is a vaccine, But aestrazennica uses DNA as the delivery While pfizer and maderna use mRna While JandJ uses traditional means (no mrna or dna)

So the pathways each vax uses is very different and not the same. Regardless, HCQ and Ivermectin is the only way to go...

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

and zinc

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes .... Yes .... indeed. And I would frankly add, that I also do not trust any prediction by Pharma.

Their animal subjects all died. And can we see the names listed of those having participated in their trials. Or are they as dead as Biden Voters?

10
1
queue-anon 1 point ago +3 / -2

Garbage. A few months? They already did trials on humans before they released them for emergency authorized use. That was well over a few months ago.

6
Swifty2727 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

That Might be true .. but it is interesting that ALL the animal died a few months/year after trials for similar ‘vaccines’ for SARS ....

But hey, I’m no doctor or scientist....I will pass on what I read and know..

My sister-in-law is a pharmacist in upstate NY... she knows of 10 dead or serious side effects from the jab and she’s only one pharmacist. She gave it to my parents and my father was hospitalized 3 weeks right after and is still on oxygen. No diagnosis outside the doctors recommending he NOT get the second shot....time will tell

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

That sucks. I am also passing information to my parents. But i won't tell them what to do because if they get covid and die I'll feel awful as well.

6
ATLAS_ONE 6 points ago +7 / -1

I don't know about this one, but I can think of a few people thay deserve a Cyanide storm 😉.

1
AngelCole 1 point ago +1 / -0

😁

5
ArmyLady 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are treatments against the cykotine storm.

6
Bedminster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes there is, just need to get the treatment started sooner than later.

4
eyerighteye 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm listening...

6
ArmyLady 6 points ago +6 / -0

hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) zinc and antibiotic against associated bacterial pneumonia; vitamin D, have heard of others. e.g. some other anti-parasite drugs such as ivermectin seem to help for the same reason apparently that the quinine based drugs do. I don't remember the reason the anti-paraciticals help against the cytokine storm.

5
Munchaussen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wheat is consumed in large amounts in the U.S. and it lessens the ability to metabolize D3 even from sunlight. If you live above the 38th parallel you already have lower than optimum levels. Trying to get someone to give up wheat (not gluten) however is not easy.

5
Scipio_Americanus 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you supplement with D3, be sure to take K2 with it as it enhances the absorption.

2
pearlrevolver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Off topic, but wheat consumption is supposedly why Europeans evolved to have lighter skin pigmentation. The lack of melanin allows the skin to better absorb vitamin D from the sun.

1
Anon1970 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gluten is IN wheat, the cause of allergic reactions.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Newusertopumpmemes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Explain about nicotine please

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
Duckhunter1960 6 points ago +6 / -0

As a preppier, yes. There is some evidence that nicotine can actual stop, slow the cykotine storm roaring through your body. There are a lot of articles out there, but here is a recent one regarding COVID specifically, it explains the theory.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01359/full

1
Newusertopumpmemes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks

1
Newusertopumpmemes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, that gives me some more avenues to research.

1
TrumpPosse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there any discussion about those that already get a heavy dose of nicotine on a daily basis? .. askin' for a fren.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
ArmyLady 3 points ago +3 / -0

I heard about that a while back. Well the shut down led me to restart and restop and restart smoking a few times . . .

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
eyerighteye 2 points ago +2 / -0

TY

2
Shalomtoyou 2 points ago +2 / -0

So HCQ et al not only work for Covid, but also the cytokine storm?

2
_thorn_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are they?

5
HelloDolly 5 points ago +5 / -0

Saw an epidemiologist and virologist from Idaho I think it was speaking at the request of the Lieutenant Governor. He said it is impossible for your body to have a Cytokine storm if you have adequate levels of Vitamin D. Said Fauci knows it - that's why he takes it. But they won't advertise the more mundane (read cheap) prophylactic measures.

3
Zerbert1420 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey Dolly this is true, however, if you have an mRNA vaccine, this isn’t the case. This is because it is part synthetic and will replicate in your body indefinitely. What they found in the animal studies of mRNA vaccines, is when they were reintroduced to coronavirus after the vaccine, they died bc the vaccine prevents the part of the immune system that is supposed to come in and take all the waste away. Our body normally first sends out T1(not actual name) cells to fight the antigen. These T1 cells are inflammatory and flood the area to fight off the antigen. In a normal functioning body, then T2 cells come in and are anti-inflammatory and clean up the mess and cool things down. In the animal studies, they found that in their organs, there was cytokines storm (mass inflammation) and there were no T2 cells present bc the mRNA vaccine apparently kills those cells. This is my current understanding after watching a bunch of interviews with Dr. Tenpenny and a few others.

1
HelloDolly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for this. I hope it's not true or that she's just mistaken somehow because sheesh. Since my post/your response though, they have made moves to get rid of the only non-mRNA vaccine out there, which is more than worrisome.

1
Newusertopumpmemes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have links to these studies? I used to be the first one telling people to Google it or ddg but the last few months every search engine has been thoroughly scrubbed of truth.

2
Zerbert1420 2 points ago +2 / -0

No i've just heard several doctors reference this study and based off the trust I have in them, took what they said at face value. I'm totally inept at doing searches for things like this. I try to google something, the algos have it set up to disprove any type of counter narrative to the mainstream, and then I just kinda give up. I wish I was better about it, but I'll keep an ear out in future interviews to see if they tell where they find these studies/info on them.

1
Newusertopumpmemes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks

2
Zerbert1420 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ws2oS141QbCu/ This is an interview with Dr. Lee Merrit who also is on top of these studies. She references the animal mRNA trials in her interview.

2
_thorn_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dr Cole :) I saw that.. didn't know it would help post vakz

2
ArmyLady 2 points ago +2 / -0

hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) zinc and antibiotic against associated bacterial pneumonia; vitamin D, have heard of others. e.g. some other anti-parasite drugs such as ivermectin seem to help for the same reason apparently that the quinine based drugs do. I don't remember the reason the anti-paraciticals help against the cytokine storm.

5
Europa 5 points ago +6 / -1

Would Trump recommend the vaccine if this were the case?

Why all this fear porn around the vaccine and the cytokine “storm”?

Something else is going on...back to the Q drops...”you have more than you know.”

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. He wouldn't. These posts are ridiculous. I notice there's been several of these types of posts lately. eVERYONE IS GONNA DIE!!

2
Europa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Working today...but its going to be my first recreational tonight...will check Q posts..see what was said.

Nit sure where to start my search

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can a lack of information in the Q posts also point to something? As in, Q didn't say shit about the vaccines being developed for the chyna virus.

hmm

5
PurpleTea 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wouldn't we have seen cytokine storms with all those people who participated in the trails of 2020.

5
Wexit-Delecto 5 points ago +6 / -1

Who’s to say the trial injections are the same as the vaccines?

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who's to say your food at the store doesn't contain cyanide?

6
Wexit-Delecto 6 points ago +6 / -0

A lot of it already does contain poison.

Cyanide isn’t suitable as it causes instant death. They prefer slow poison.

But yeah, I’m sure they just went by the rules on this vaccine.

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The could easily start putting something in Advil that'll kill ya after many years ... they could do anything really, if they wanted to.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

They probably already do. There are an awful lot of overdoses on that drug. What if one in every 100,000 pills is just hyper concentrated?

1
PurpleTea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lay off the mushrooms.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zero overdoses for magic mushrooms in all of history. Which is the safer treatment for pain?

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

4
R3tro 4 points ago +4 / -0

When Q referenced the cure vs the disease.... the cure was never the vax, the cure referenced was HCQ and Ivermectin...

Though Q is the master of double speak where a meaning means multiple things

3
GeoffreyDoorknob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are all the people who participated in vaccine trials (started a year ago) all dead now? Maybe it’s been covered up.

3
EllipticCurveBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. I have a friend who did and is fine right now. (She’s an active RN)

I kind of find it disturbing that there seems to be a spirit of hope in this community that the vaccines fail (Trump initiated and promoted these vaccines by the way).

I’m not getting them because they’re experimental and I am young and healthy so it makes no sense to... but I certainly hope they work and don’t cause harm to anyone, libtard or not.

3
Anon1970 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump did not initiate the vaccines. Big Pharma DID.

Trump only forced the Cabal's hand of perpetual lockdowns by implementing Op. Warp Speed which is a logistical approach for expediting medicines et al to the public.

The one thing that bothers me about Trump is him seemingly promoting these "vaccines".

2
MahaYoshi 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have several family members who I’m very close to, that are all hell bent on getting the vaccine. Most have received their first shot and will be going for shot 2 soon.

I’m not getting the vaccine myself, but I literally pray every night that the effects of this vaccine won’t be harmful, or at least will be fully recoverable, because there are way too many people in my life who I can do nothing to stop from taking the vaccine.

At this point, all these “everyone will die” posts are just preaching to the choir that already is not taking them, and all it’s doing for me is sending me into a panic.

At this point, if any doctor wants to actually help, they should be presenting things I can convince my loved ones to do to help mitigate the effects, because that’s the only argument I have left.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m in the J&J trial. I defo got the placebo though.

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

This community is turning for the worse regarding these vaccines. JUST DONT TAKE THEM, but stop spreading bull shit you have zero proof on. ie: EVERYONE WILL DIE.

0
1Markseeker 0 points ago +2 / -2

How do you respond to the previous animal testing trials with these types of vaccines where the animals DID die?

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't respond to it or care, I'm not taking the vaccine. I just know they have tested it on humans in the trials and they have all died yet. It's a "we'll see what happens' type of thing.

2
Tazzurit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this what is meant by-the end is not for everyone? Is this why President Trump promoted the vaccine and took credit for the rapidity of release and encouraged us to get vaccinated? If this happens...and we already see side effects and deaths..does the "ends justify the means"?
I will not hide from facts and truth, no matter how horrible, but do we really think Q and Trump led us down a path of destruction? Or could there be others at work here?
We are talking about many thousands/millions dying-some are our friends and relatives. People we love. So either Trump and Q were put here for hope and true change, or we just lined up for the cattle cars. We cannot have it both ways. He is a stable genus as we have said many times. He had to know. And I cant believe if Q is so far seeing, this would be the answer.

4
Swifty2727 [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

There can be more then one truth..: this is why the Lord gave us free choice...reasoning... made us inquisitive. I will be saddened and sorrowful if these events come to pass but I will sleep well knowing I warned all I loved and even those I don’t and let them make their own decisions. Q, Trump and others gave the awakening... was up to everyone independently to chose for themselves.... some chose wisely some didn’t. Life is just a collection of the choices we make or don’t.

4
Tazzurit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you. This is an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine so we research, we think about it and we.make our best choice as you said

3
queue-anon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q and Trump would have said something about the vaccines. Honestly, people here think Trump's operation warp speed was to kill everyone?

3
Tazzurit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think people wonder and research and see this type of news and grow concerned. Others see that this may be disinformation as much as saying vaccines are perfectly safe. I think neither Q or Trump led us down a wrong path-until proven otherwise

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

True

2
InmatesRunTheAsylum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok - I have no idea where to post this or where to even ask such a question. Suppose one spouse gets the jab and the other one refuses. Can any of that shot be transferred through the exchange of bodily fluids? Does anybody know? What are the physical ramifications? This is beyond horrifying on so many levels.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Icantdothis2 3 points ago +4 / -1

The storm is upon us?

2
Swifty2727 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks fren.... I didn’t create the meme ... just shared .... but when it comes to spelling I can’t throw the first stone ha....

2
Swifty2727 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually wait, now I’m confused.. I looked it up ... it is cytokine

1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I'm a dummy. Just ignore.

Prolly shoulda just dm'd but was feeling lazy. Post incredibly topical to a conversation IRL recently had.

2
Imin-theinternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh well.

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just remembered something simple which can possibly help prevent cytokine storms:

bicarbonate of soda

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/study-baking-soda-anti-inflammatory-daily-dose-may-fight-autoimmune-diseases/

I believe vitamin D helps prevent them too.

1
Gashhand 1 point ago +2 / -1

If this happens there will be more than a few medical people hanging from trees and lampposts.

1
DeadLivesMatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

As they should not only for the past year but since 1913. Let them hang.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

When were the first shots given? Seems to me they were started in the autumn, so close on to 6 months now. Seems that if she is right, people should have been dying already. Of course, who knows if they are and it isn't being reported, but if it were in the numbers she and others suggested, we should certainly be hearing something by now, one would think.

2
1Markseeker 2 points ago +3 / -1

The subjects would need to get sick again. That's the rub - not the jab (although issues from the jab itself are being underreported), but getting sick again. And when these people get sick again, it will be difficult to pin the death or major issue on the jab because it happened so long ago. This is called plausible deniability.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +4 / -0

As Dr Cahill points out, you can tell by autopsy because the pattern of damage is different if the injury is by viral infection versus by pathogenic priming autoimmune response.

Will they do the autopsies?

Doubt it.

2
BatteryBaron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember pretty much all deaths are reported as covid. So there ya go.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KHo3P0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course, the experts will just claim that the virus simply mutated. Nothing to see here... move along.

1
Hodar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taking bets now that. the DIMS will blame Trump.

1
Quixotic 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you make a fucking info graphic

SPELL THE NAME RIGHT IN THE HEADER

1
Swifty2727 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn’t make it, just shared it ...but one would think you’d at least get the name correct ... but since I’m not the worlds best speller I can’t throw the first stone...

1
Quixotic 1 point ago +1 / -0

i assumed you didn't make it but i notice this quite often and I wonder at times if it is deliberate to discredit the information

-1
TrumpParty007 -1 points ago +1 / -2

guess i need to print this up. i have family members that got to the vax...

-1
prometheus_xiii -1 points ago +1 / -2

Calm before the storm? Double meaning?

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

NO. You really think when Trump first said that he was talking about a vaccine side effect?

The storm is in reference to what Q has posted about ffs. THE GREAT AWAKENING. The fall of the cabal.