Is this true? Do you think 34 states would sign on? And would it hold weight if we did?
(media.greatawakening.win)
WWG1WGA
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
Constitutional conventions are very very dangerous. Anything can be brought forward, there is a reason there has only ever been one convention.
Its a convention of states, not a constitutional convention. No more dangerous than the re-writing of the constitution we have going on right now
I will have to look into that more, my understanding has been 2 methods of amending the constitution, Congress or the states call a constitutional convention, I’ve always understood conventions are very dangerous and there has only ever been the one. Granted they are stomping all over the constitution and violating it but the constitution still Is what it is. We need to get leaders back in power who will support the constitution.
The only people that call the constitutional conventions “dangerous“ are those that are scared of WE THE PEOPLE.
This is true. Constitutional conventions scare DC politicians. Why? Because suddenly they don't get any more say than you or I. Conventions bypass them - and that's the point.
Or scared of what some crazy state like NY or CA might being. Under a constitutional convention anything can be proposed. We run the risk of something far worse being added.