1145
Apr 13, 2018 10:07:44 PM EDT
Trust POTUS.
Sparrow Red.
Missiles only.
Intel good.
Q
Sparrow Red might refer to this Novel/Film called Red Sparrow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sparrow_(novel)
It's about double-agent CIA synesthesia assassins from Russia, I guess.
Is the name switch up intentional? I think it might have been done to establish an acronym.
Running down the left-hand side, there is a possible acronym: TSMI
Acronym Definition
TSMI Tax Systems Modernization Institute
TSMI Total Stock Market Index
TSMI Transportation Systems Management Inc. (Canada)
All seem relevant to today.
But, here's something freaking sinister.
If TSMI means Tax Systems Modernization Institute
That institute is funded by the IRS per this document: https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1995/9501/950111.PDF
The IITRI, who hosts the TSMI with the IRS as the sponsor is a "GLP-compliant preclinical contract research organization (CRO)" out of Chicago (everyone's favorite pit of corruption).
IITRI specializes in GLP toxicology and safety studies, IND-enabling programs, infectious disease vaccine and therapeutic development, and inhalation toxicology programs for the biotech, pharmaceutical, and government sponsors.
Question: Why was the Tax Systems Modernization Institute research being undertaken by a virology lab!?
The lab was founded in 1936, around the same time the IRS fired up. It was originally known as the Armour Research Foundation.
They started research into programming algorithms in 1961! Way ahead of the technological curve. Makes you wonder how they went from programming to virology -- Oh wait, not unless they were making viruses/vaccines as programs using computer models, like Bill Gates' "Operating System Updates"
Oh, and get a load of the address:
10 West 35th Street. Chicago, IL 60616
Wowzers! A 666 right in the address, huh?
Now the lab seems intent on Covid research now. Seeing how the Q post was in 2018, I think this is a proof that Q knew about the pandemic way ahead of time, and possibly the ones responsible for its manufacturing.
Is it possible it was cooked up in the U.S. at this lab and given to the Wuhan lab to blame China and force a Xenophobic narrative of asian-hate? Maybe. I'm not ruling it out yet.
I think this is a big dig I stumbled upon, all because Q wrote Sparrow Red instead of Red Sparrow.
No coincidences?
Here ya go.
Thanks a lot!
While the study does prove you can set a neural network to detect changes of the brain due to EMF, it only postulates that you could use this method to check if EMF exposure can modify brain activity.
It almost reads like they know ahead of time that EMF can affect the drosophila brain. Considering that's their preliminary hypothesis, I guess that's to be expected.
Even so, isn't the fact that they catalogued predictable patterns, such that they could train a neural network to detect them, proof enough that EMF-radiation CAN affect the brain?
Versus a control group who aren't being bombarded with EMF-radiation, I don't see how it could mean anything else.
Would only a thermal interaction, as is suggested that 5G is only capable of, be able to do this to parts of the brain with such predictability?
Many enzymes are temperature sensitive (all really, but some more than others). Chemical interactions are the same. Localized temperature variations can cause broader effects, and this is what is being studied I think. In the case of a cell phone, the transmitter is often on one side of the brain, affecting mostly those neurons closest to the ear. This can have a localized heat variation effect which can alter neural activity due to some heat sensitivity in some molecular or enzymatic activity.
To give an example, lets say an enzyme catalyzes some reaction at a rate of 10/degree C/second. (This is a completely a made up number for illustration. Such dynamics are generally not linear.) So at 37 C the enzyme would catalyze its reaction 370 times in a second. But if the temperature in the cell in question raised to 38 C, it would now catalyze the reaction at a rate of 380 times in a second. On a broader scale this could change the overall dynamics of the neuron, or an entire area of the brain.
This is just an illustration to give an idea of an effect. The numbers are not to be translated literally. (I.e. a cell phone almost certainly does not raise the temperature in any local area by anywhere near 1C.)
For 5G I don't know what the penetration depth is. I doubt it would be so potentially unidirectional or localized as a cell phone. So could it do it "predictably"? No, not unless their were a 5G tower every five feet and you were the only one they were trying to control. Even then, I seriously doubt it.
Mind control (and separately, genetic manipulation) is a very real possibility if we lose this war, but I don't think its coming from 5G.