On the contrary, J&J and AZ are more likely to alter DNA because they inject actual dsDNA (a new hard drive) into the nucleus. They also do just as much to alter mRNA (the software).
This dsDNA that they inject is still very unlikely to get incorporated into the cells DNA before it is broken down. HOWEVER, it is much, MUCH more likely to be mutagenic than the mRNA from the Pfizer/Moderna (P/M) vaccines. It takes it from basically impossible (cytosolic mRNA) to not very likely (viral injected dsDNA).
P/M inject the mRNA into the cytosol where it makes the protein.
J&J and AZ inject an adenovirus, which attacks the cells, gets into the cells, then attacks the nucleus. It injects the spike protein DNA into the nucleus. The nucleus makes the mRNA, that gets carried out into the cytosol, and then it makes the spike protein, just like the Pfizer and Moderna.
Anyone who thinks the J&J/AZ are less invasive are completely clueless. As to which is safer, if I had to guess it would be P/M, because of the fewer steps, less invasive nature and much less likely chance of altering the DNA.
However, only data could really tell us, and that is being hidden.
I'll have to research all that you said a bit before taking at face value but nice dig.
This is the way.
I'm never getting the jab ever. HCQ, Zinc, and D for me
D + Zn + Mg (because Mg is essential and some people are unknowingly deficient) on a semi regular basis will keep you nice and ready for not just SARS, but the flu as well. Vitamin deficiency is the most likely way to get more sick from a pathogen than you otherwise would be.
Ivermectin or HCQ look to be very good if you do get sick. I think Ivermectin may be better from what I've seen, but I have not done sufficient due diligence to say that with any certainty. Also I think there have been no problems taking both at the same time.
Feb 9 2020: Efficacy of single shot reported at only 66%, “J&J CEO says people may need annual COVID-19 vaccine shots for next several years” https://archive.vn/QIqiC
April 7 2021: “Women say they are having heavier and more painful PERIODS since getting their COVID-19 vaccines - as several claim it has also messed up their monthly cycle”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9446907/Some-women-report-heavier-painful-PERIODS-getting-COVID-19-vaccine.html
“revealing their heavy flow, worsened cramps, and irregular timing — with one saying she spent 16 days bleeding after getting the Johnson & Johnson shot.”
“'Does this have to do with the way the vax response is mounting a broader inflammatory response, possibly moreso because of the lipid nanoparticle or mRNA mechanism? Either way I am fascinated! Inflammation + tissue remodeling = extra bleedypants!' she added.”
Also moderna
Someone admits to feeling scared to admit the vaccine caused her problem but after the second shot she knew.
Now that vaccine has been recalled due to deadly blood clots?
On the contrary, J&J and AZ are more likely to alter DNA because they inject actual dsDNA (a new hard drive) into the nucleus. They also do just as much to alter mRNA (the software).
This dsDNA that they inject is still very unlikely to get incorporated into the cells DNA before it is broken down. HOWEVER, it is much, MUCH more likely to be mutagenic than the mRNA from the Pfizer/Moderna (P/M) vaccines. It takes it from basically impossible (cytosolic mRNA) to not very likely (viral injected dsDNA).
P/M inject the mRNA into the cytosol where it makes the protein.
J&J and AZ inject an adenovirus, which attacks the cells, gets into the cells, then attacks the nucleus. It injects the spike protein DNA into the nucleus. The nucleus makes the mRNA, that gets carried out into the cytosol, and then it makes the spike protein, just like the Pfizer and Moderna.
Anyone who thinks the J&J/AZ are less invasive are completely clueless. As to which is safer, if I had to guess it would be P/M, because of the fewer steps, less invasive nature and much less likely chance of altering the DNA.
However, only data could really tell us, and that is being hidden.
This is the way.
D + Zn + Mg (because Mg is essential and some people are unknowingly deficient) on a semi regular basis will keep you nice and ready for not just SARS, but the flu as well. Vitamin deficiency is the most likely way to get more sick from a pathogen than you otherwise would be.
Ivermectin or HCQ look to be very good if you do get sick. I think Ivermectin may be better from what I've seen, but I have not done sufficient due diligence to say that with any certainty. Also I think there have been no problems taking both at the same time.
Safest? Steven Johnson syndrome? (Warning graphic) https://archive.vn/Cbyu4
Deaths https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2021/03/young-people-are-now-dying-following-the-experimental-johnson-and-johnson-covid-injections/
Feb 9 2020: Efficacy of single shot reported at only 66%, “J&J CEO says people may need annual COVID-19 vaccine shots for next several years” https://archive.vn/QIqiC
April 7 2021: “Women say they are having heavier and more painful PERIODS since getting their COVID-19 vaccines - as several claim it has also messed up their monthly cycle” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9446907/Some-women-report-heavier-painful-PERIODS-getting-COVID-19-vaccine.html “revealing their heavy flow, worsened cramps, and irregular timing — with one saying she spent 16 days bleeding after getting the Johnson & Johnson shot.” “'Does this have to do with the way the vax response is mounting a broader inflammatory response, possibly moreso because of the lipid nanoparticle or mRNA mechanism? Either way I am fascinated! Inflammation + tissue remodeling = extra bleedypants!' she added.” Also moderna Someone admits to feeling scared to admit the vaccine caused her problem but after the second shot she knew.