On the contrary, J&J and AZ are more likely to alter DNA because they inject actual dsDNA (a new hard drive) into the nucleus. They also do just as much to alter mRNA (the software).
This dsDNA that they inject is still very unlikely to get incorporated into the cells DNA before it is broken down. HOWEVER, it is much, MUCH more likely to be mutagenic than the mRNA from the Pfizer/Moderna (P/M) vaccines. It takes it from basically impossible (cytosolic mRNA) to not very likely (viral injected dsDNA).
P/M inject the mRNA into the cytosol where it makes the protein.
J&J and AZ inject an adenovirus, which attacks the cells, gets into the cells, then attacks the nucleus. It injects the spike protein DNA into the nucleus. The nucleus makes the mRNA, that gets carried out into the cytosol, and then it makes the spike protein, just like the Pfizer and Moderna.
Anyone who thinks the J&J/AZ are less invasive are completely clueless. As to which is safer, if I had to guess it would be P/M, because of the fewer steps, less invasive nature and much less likely chance of altering the DNA.
However, only data could really tell us, and that is being hidden.
I'll have to research all that you said a bit before taking at face value but nice dig.
This is the way.
I'm never getting the jab ever. HCQ, Zinc, and D for me
D + Zn + Mg (because Mg is essential and some people are unknowingly deficient) on a semi regular basis will keep you nice and ready for not just SARS, but the flu as well. Vitamin deficiency is the most likely way to get more sick from a pathogen than you otherwise would be.
Ivermectin or HCQ look to be very good if you do get sick. I think Ivermectin may be better from what I've seen, but I have not done sufficient due diligence to say that with any certainty. Also I think there have been no problems taking both at the same time.
Ivermectin might be better for severe cases and HCQ might be better for mild cases, or prevention. This explains why the so called "HCQ clinical trials" reported that HCQ did not significantly reduce symptoms. HCQ has to be administered early!
The flu is that virus that has plagued us for centuries (or forever) that recently got eaten up by the coronavirus. That's how bad coronavirus is. IT EVEN EATS OTHER VIRUSES!
It's only a matter of time before people start questioning the flu data and that becomes "the science"...
On the contrary, J&J and AZ are more likely to alter DNA because they inject actual dsDNA (a new hard drive) into the nucleus. They also do just as much to alter mRNA (the software).
This dsDNA that they inject is still very unlikely to get incorporated into the cells DNA before it is broken down. HOWEVER, it is much, MUCH more likely to be mutagenic than the mRNA from the Pfizer/Moderna (P/M) vaccines. It takes it from basically impossible (cytosolic mRNA) to not very likely (viral injected dsDNA).
P/M inject the mRNA into the cytosol where it makes the protein.
J&J and AZ inject an adenovirus, which attacks the cells, gets into the cells, then attacks the nucleus. It injects the spike protein DNA into the nucleus. The nucleus makes the mRNA, that gets carried out into the cytosol, and then it makes the spike protein, just like the Pfizer and Moderna.
Anyone who thinks the J&J/AZ are less invasive are completely clueless. As to which is safer, if I had to guess it would be P/M, because of the fewer steps, less invasive nature and much less likely chance of altering the DNA.
However, only data could really tell us, and that is being hidden.
This is the way.
D + Zn + Mg (because Mg is essential and some people are unknowingly deficient) on a semi regular basis will keep you nice and ready for not just SARS, but the flu as well. Vitamin deficiency is the most likely way to get more sick from a pathogen than you otherwise would be.
Ivermectin or HCQ look to be very good if you do get sick. I think Ivermectin may be better from what I've seen, but I have not done sufficient due diligence to say that with any certainty. Also I think there have been no problems taking both at the same time.
Ivermectin might be better for severe cases and HCQ might be better for mild cases, or prevention. This explains why the so called "HCQ clinical trials" reported that HCQ did not significantly reduce symptoms. HCQ has to be administered early!
I've heard that if you combine the hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin and zinc it becomes extremely effective.
The flu is that virus that has plagued us for centuries (or forever) that recently got eaten up by the coronavirus. That's how bad coronavirus is. IT EVEN EATS OTHER VIRUSES!
It's only a matter of time before people start questioning the flu data and that becomes "the science"...