The DS had the mRNA jab prepared for years. If Trump pushed back, they'll declare he's crazy and letting people die. So he pushed a 'safer' vac and got it out to compete with the bad Jab.
Now he has to push the J&J so people understand there's a difference, learn which is 'his' and which is 'theirs'. This negated the 'we had no other choice' and will sink the CDC/WHO pushing the wrong vac.
How can you dismantle such well known orgs to the unaware masses?
Optic-wise, Trump pushed the safer vac to strike back against evil, not much else can prevent the jab push on the unwitting mass. Every J&J jab could be a life saved.
Hydroxychloroquine and zinc.
Thanks yup important too.
There is absolutely zero reason to assume the J&J vaccine is safer than the Pfizer/Moderna vaccines.
Zero reason.
On the contrary, there is reason (biologically) to be even more suspect of it. There is also anecdotal evidence that it is harmful, just like the others.
When (if) we get better data we can make better judgements, but at the moment assuming the J&J is safer is you allowing authority figures to think for you, which is how we got in this mess to begin with.
Never forget, this is a disinformation war. Never stop thinking for yourself.
That doesn't even mention the fact that the vaccines seem to be completely unnecessary since we have really good therapeutics, and covid just ain't that deadly.
The big difference is that the J&J one is NOT mRNA. Prob why the DS is killing it. The mRNA injections (they do not meet criteria to be called a vax) include nanotech that targets the brain and DNA.
These statements are predicated on the vaccines being what they say they are, and containing the ingredients they say they do.
The statement that the mRNA vaccines target the brain more than the adenovirus vaccines is not credible without sufficient evidence on both sides. By looking at the tech, my estimation is they they are both transcytosed through the brain microvascular endothelium (BBB) at similar rates. If you have evidence to the contrary, please show me.
As for the mRNA vaccines targeting DNA...
I have posted many times on why this is unlikely. Think of it this way:
Every cell that exists or has ever existed (all life for all of time) is full of mRNA. In the case of eukaryotes (includes humans) our DNA is strictly separated by a gated structure called the nucleus. Once mRNA leaves the nucleus it is never allowed back in. Is it impossible for it to get back in? No, but it is incredibly unlikely. Even if it does, writing mRNA to DNA is even more unlikely.
There are enzymes that write mRNA to DNA but such systems are strictly regulated, both in expression of the enzymes, location of the enzymes on the DNA and what RNA is accepted. It is virtually impossible for mRNA to be written to DNA unless other tools are included with it.
It is for these reasons that even though all cells are full of mRNA at all times, not a single one of them gets written to DNA ever (on human time scales), unless they are of the exact type designed to do so (the specific RNA sequence for telomerase e.g.).
None of those other required tools are listed ingredients in any of the vaccines.
The adenovirus on the other hand is designed to inject dsDNA (double stranded DNA, the same type our chromosomes are made of, aka, our hard drive) INTO the nucleus. That's what adenoviruses do, which is why they are a common tool for altering gene expression in experiments. Now, injecting dsDNA into a nucleus is unlikely to get incorporated into the genome unless it is of a specific sequence designed for that purpose. But it is possible, even if unlikely.
So your assessment of which one is likely to "target DNA" is the opposite of the truth from the perspective of molecular biology. In truth NEITHER target DNA, but the adenovirus vector is many, many times more likely to alter DNA than the cytosolic mRNA of the other tech.
Your assessment of which is more likely to cross the BBB may be correct, but it would require evidence to support it. From just looking at the tech, and having knowledge of what it takes to induce transcytosis through the endothelium I think both are probably the same order of magnitude. I welcome evidence to the contrary (science papers only please, or articles with links to them).
Im no doc or science brain, so I bow to your clearly superior knowledge.
Takeaway? They are ALL unsafe and to be avoided. (IMHO of course.)
You will find no disagreement from me on this statement.
If he didn’t push it fast to make it emergency use only Once he got out of office they would’ve mandated we all take it. He saved many of us but not all of us. Each of us ultimately have to save ourselves.
I have no idea why Trump is pushing the vac. It’s one of his only moves that’s throwing me for a loop. I do know that if/when things start going south people will blame Fasci, the CDC, and the FDA and not Trump. The media will try to blame Trump but will find it hard to do so.
I don't know about your theory. From what I can see its all moving forward as planned with tens of millions of people already vaccinated from a mystery virus that has a 99% survival rate. Even Ivanka Trump posted herself getting vaccinated today, with the comment that she hopes everyone else does it too. No mention at all of what vaccine she received ...
I thought that was odd.
I don't believe that was legit. For several reasons but mainly Ivanka would never show up looking so casual at a dumpy CVS or whatever for a photo op. Second, she is missing that red bracelet she always wears. I dont think that is her at all.
I like this theory as well. Time passes on and the pieces are getting clearer. So I hope.
I don't buy any of the "why Trump is pushing the vax" theories. They seem convoluted.
For now I still think Gen. Tom McInerney got it right that Trump was hoodwinked. From even before he ever set foot in the White House, Trump was surrounded by evil swamp creatures and he was inexperienced enough to trust their expertise before he learned otherwise.
Doesn’t make sense when you read the Q posts. Trump knew about the corruption before he was elected. He even went into great detail during his rallies before he was elected. He had Admiral Rogers on his side. I don’t think Trump was naive to the fact that Washington was extremely corrupt.
He knew that Obama lied about his birth certificate for a long, long time. He also knew about Epstein Island.
The Q posts have NEVER made sense to me. The reason I am here on this forum is because I like the people - not because I believe that Q has particular merit.
People close to Trump have said that he doesn't always exercise good judgment on his choices of personnel who will be close to him.
And that his "Apprentice" "you're fired" persona does not really reflect what he is like.
Nobody has ever debunked the Q proofs. There is no reason to think they do not have proper merit.
Frankly if Trump wasn't playing some kind of long game and keeping his enemies close, and rather was being strung along like a puppet by evil people, them he did not deserve the office.
When some target date gets reached and nothing comes of it, the goal posts shift. In the meantime, we kept being strung along.
Nobody has absolute control over the future. Nobody.
How many really talented people here are actually doing something ? Probably only a handful have been involved with challenging election results, are looking to run for seats in their local GOPs, etc.
Trump did deserve his office and deserves to be returned. He opened up the can of worms called Human Trafficking. And he allowed sunlight to hit the most nefarious parts of the DC swamp.
What target dates are those? The ones we keep setting for ourselves? The goal posts haven't moved. We just never knew where they were.
"He opened up the can of worms called human trafficking" Oh you mean the one Q talks about? The reason the military got him to run in the first place?
Trump knew about the deep state and, according to you, did nothing to stop it to the point where it got so big it is now a bigger threat than when he entered. If Q is all nonsense he did not keep his most important campaign promise.
HighFrequency said it best, Q did not tell us when it would go down. Also, digital soldiers are actively getting involved at the local level and are part of the reason election laws keep getting passed. If you think Q did not get anybody to do anything, you have not been paying attention.