Without knowing many other variables, such as age or "comorbidities", diet or other immune issues, there is no way to come to that conclusion from this data.
On the contrary, since we don't know how many people were "protected" by the vaccine (from 0 to all), or how many were infected with SARS-cov-2 (from 0 to all) no conclusion can be made except that the death rate appears to be substantially below the previous vaccines where pathogenic priming caused severe reactions and death in around 5% of the vaccine recipients.
Since this data suggests it is substantially below that number even in the worst case, this is good news.
Question: "What did the "vaccine" do to make these people more likely to die of the virus?”
Answer: Exactly what it was designed to do.
Boom
Without knowing many other variables, such as age or "comorbidities", diet or other immune issues, there is no way to come to that conclusion from this data.
On the contrary, since we don't know how many people were "protected" by the vaccine (from 0 to all), or how many were infected with SARS-cov-2 (from 0 to all) no conclusion can be made except that the death rate appears to be substantially below the previous vaccines where pathogenic priming caused severe reactions and death in around 5% of the vaccine recipients.
Since this data suggests it is substantially below that number even in the worst case, this is good news.