What I can't wrap my head around is Flynn's constant endorsement of Q and no one (but us) seem to care/notice. Why the flying fuck would GENERAL FUCKING FLYNN be saying shit like WWG1WGA if this was all a larp? Genuine question, does anyone have any theories?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
To also play devil's advocate :
Why wouldn't trump, his campaign, his family, his gov staff, or his close friends make a comment saying something like "a lot of good patriots are being misled online - don't trust anonymous sources even if they claim to be maga and have a great plan for our country"
I'm a political consultant.
The very first thing I'd do is address it, as would any other professional - the only way you wouldn't address it, is if you wanted it to continue.
IE, that is an endorsement - as is using the anon requested tippy toppy in a speech, and constant sog whistling to our codes and comms.
Anyone who doesn't see this isn't being genuine or their being paid to speak otherwise.
You would do well in public school with critical theory. The socratic method wasn't a tool you were given.
I guess you can keep pretending to logic - do go on. The next diatribe will probably have even less substance. Please continue so we can all enjoy it.
I mean Trump’s response was “is it supposed to be a bad thing?” that a lot of people believe he ran for President to fight people in power who are pedophiles and have been moving to destroy individual liberty. I do think it’s a bad thing, but only if it’s not true. In your view, why didn’t the news reporter respond “yes, FALSE allegations and people believing a lie is “a bad thing””?