If you look at the actual contributions page that they link to in the article, there is no evidence to support the statement that he gave money to any republicans at all.
Not that numerous democratic contributions are much better, but still; I'm not understanding the apparent hit piece.
If you look at the actual contributions page that they link to in the article, there is no evidence to support the statement that he gave money to any republicans at all.
Not that numerous democratic contributions are much better, but still; I'm not understanding the apparent hit piece.