Wth are you even talking about? You're reading all sorts of weird things into an EXAMPLE and then getting upset by that. And you're running around accusing others of not including a block of text in their statements.
"Maybe you should reconsider your position if your only source on blood libel comes from Wikipedia?"
Erm... did you even read my comment? You clearly have no idea what I said. What the hell are you talking about? Wikipedia? So random and pressumptious.
And another thing, could you try being concise and get to your point. Throwing a block of text at people and ranting about things that have nothing to do with the point they made is just silly. You didn't get my point at all and if anything you seem angry that I pointed out the Extreme Strawmen tactic of the Left. Are you upset that I called out their tactics?
What are you a fan of how they destroy the truth and sweep victims under the rug? Because that's how your wall of weird text reads.
Be more concise and clear in your posts. It'll help a lot in having an actual discussion.
All this ranting because you're upset that my example is not absurd enough for you. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. That says a lot about you.
I don't think you even read nor understand my original comment in the slightest. You're basically ranting over things I never said. And then freaking out over that.
You're creating an entire argument in your head and screaming about that made-up argument in your mind.
So you think my example of a Leftist extreme strawmen was acceptable to normies? That they wouldn't reject that as absurd? That's actually good news. That means the normies are way more awake than any of us realized. I didn't realize you thought that.
The whole point of the example was showcasing what wouldn't be acceptable to normies. My example was not about what people on this site would accept. Almost everyone but you understood that point. I don't know why it went over your head.
My point was this is how the Left control the sheep. They say that to the sheep. This was especially true in the days of the Satanic Panic.
Now you're accusing me of being a shill while you get more and more shrill.
I'd say you have a real problem in how you deal with disagreement. There was no need to blow up and become rude. You could have just had a discussion with me. Instead you get angry and rude like all you want is a fight over something you have clearly misunderstood.
Again, the example was what the Left says to the NORMIES. Are you really going to argue that if you said that to the typical normie they'll go, "Oh! Of course! Why didn't I see it?"
It's sad that you can't see how you blew things out of proportion.
Wth are you even talking about? You're reading all sorts of weird things into an EXAMPLE and then getting upset by that. And you're running around accusing others of not including a block of text in their statements.
"Maybe you should reconsider your position if your only source on blood libel comes from Wikipedia?"
Erm... did you even read my comment? You clearly have no idea what I said. What the hell are you talking about? Wikipedia? So random and pressumptious.
And another thing, could you try being concise and get to your point. Throwing a block of text at people and ranting about things that have nothing to do with the point they made is just silly. You didn't get my point at all and if anything you seem angry that I pointed out the Extreme Strawmen tactic of the Left. Are you upset that I called out their tactics?
What are you a fan of how they destroy the truth and sweep victims under the rug? Because that's how your wall of weird text reads.
Be more concise and clear in your posts. It'll help a lot in having an actual discussion.
All this ranting because you're upset that my example is not absurd enough for you. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. That says a lot about you.
I don't think you even read nor understand my original comment in the slightest. You're basically ranting over things I never said. And then freaking out over that.
You're creating an entire argument in your head and screaming about that made-up argument in your mind.
So you think my example of a Leftist extreme strawmen was acceptable to normies? That they wouldn't reject that as absurd? That's actually good news. That means the normies are way more awake than any of us realized. I didn't realize you thought that.
The whole point of the example was showcasing what wouldn't be acceptable to normies. My example was not about what people on this site would accept. Almost everyone but you understood that point. I don't know why it went over your head.
My point was this is how the Left control the sheep. They say that to the sheep. This was especially true in the days of the Satanic Panic.
Now you're accusing me of being a shill while you get more and more shrill.
I'd say you have a real problem in how you deal with disagreement. There was no need to blow up and become rude. You could have just had a discussion with me. Instead you get angry and rude like all you want is a fight over something you have clearly misunderstood.
Again, the example was what the Left says to the NORMIES. Are you really going to argue that if you said that to the typical normie they'll go, "Oh! Of course! Why didn't I see it?"
It's sad that you can't see how you blew things out of proportion.