Unfortunately that is still a very real risk when the right people put out the 'wrong' information, I mean they nuked her twitter from 2 little tweets that didn't even include names, imagine what they would do if she dropped names without proof(given who she is(former MAJOR porn-star, says she was trafficked, lots of VERY high profile boyfriends etc...) would draw a lot of attention), now imagine her putting out proof, realistically she wouldn't survive long enough for that to happen.
As it is she is probably already getting credible threats, seeing strange cars parked outside her house, being followed etc...
There is a time for proof but currently a single bottom up individual providing it isn't really survivable(Cappy...), that will change....................
I listened to the X22 interview with Dr. Shiva. He said the 4 hr hearing he had for an emergency injunction revealed that twitter banned him at the express wishes of the MA Sec. of Elections ( ? ). Anyway, the courtroom testimony revealed that some politicians have a special relationship with twitter to the point that if they ask twitter to ban someone it happens. Dr. Shiva said that he'd written plenty of tweets about the "fraud" and the "steal" and was never bannd. But by mentioning these politicians names he was banned. He has a YUGE case going to be heard. About the Govt. violation of his 1st Amendment right , and the fraud itself. Anyway, based on what he said, I'm guessing that someone important and connected had her banned. It wasn't what she said that caused the algorithm to ban her. It was direct human intervention. Just my guess though.
Kinda hard to keep speaking if you're dead...
Unfortunately that is still a very real risk when the right people put out the 'wrong' information, I mean they nuked her twitter from 2 little tweets that didn't even include names, imagine what they would do if she dropped names without proof(given who she is(former MAJOR porn-star, says she was trafficked, lots of VERY high profile boyfriends etc...) would draw a lot of attention), now imagine her putting out proof, realistically she wouldn't survive long enough for that to happen.
As it is she is probably already getting credible threats, seeing strange cars parked outside her house, being followed etc...
There is a time for proof but currently a single bottom up individual providing it isn't really survivable(Cappy...), that will change....................
I listened to the X22 interview with Dr. Shiva. He said the 4 hr hearing he had for an emergency injunction revealed that twitter banned him at the express wishes of the MA Sec. of Elections ( ? ). Anyway, the courtroom testimony revealed that some politicians have a special relationship with twitter to the point that if they ask twitter to ban someone it happens. Dr. Shiva said that he'd written plenty of tweets about the "fraud" and the "steal" and was never bannd. But by mentioning these politicians names he was banned. He has a YUGE case going to be heard. About the Govt. violation of his 1st Amendment right , and the fraud itself. Anyway, based on what he said, I'm guessing that someone important and connected had her banned. It wasn't what she said that caused the algorithm to ban her. It was direct human intervention. Just my guess though.