So you would promote restricting innovation for your moral judgements?
Who are you to decide what is or is not appropriate path for our technological development. Even if you have 10,000 friends that believe as you do, by what right do you have to decide such choices for the rest of humanity?
That is exactly the mindset behind The Great Reset. A world where we are protected from ourselves by our elite overlords.
I suggest if it does not directly impact your own pursuit of life, liberty and happiness, you should have no say in the doings of others.
Who are you is the precisely the correct question to ask as you do. We each should have sovereignty over our body and choices and what we believe. Problem is the last few centuries its been anything but. This transhumanism is an attempt to dehumanize your individuality.
Think how charismatic the Clintons were. We sheep are so gullible yet we think we our so intelligent with our egos. It’s our downfall. Symbology is their downfall.
I love how iPhone’s spelling checker doesn’t recognize transhumanism and adrenochrome. Hiding something Apple?
This transhumanism is an attempt to dehumanize your individuality.
I agree. It has been made to be exactly that. But the tools of what you call "transhumanism" are just tools. The fact that they have been used to dehumanize is an evil use of a tool for evil purposes by evil people.
Anytime you look at tech and think "how evil" are you thinking of the tool, or potential abuse you see? Are you thinking of all the sins of our overlords when you think that?
They have invaded us, and destroyed our morality and decisions; hijacked our tools and ideas to destroy us. That is not the fault of the tool. It is not the fault of our ideas. It is not the fault of innovation. It is the fault of our evil overlords and their hijacking of our good tools for their evil designs.
I concur. Always tech can be used for good or bad. However, the marketing message is nothing but confusing an individual’s soul. Making them feel worthless without fake tits or whatever. They can never steal or take your soul. But if you surrender your soul they gotcha.
So in a convoluted way I guess I’m arguing against them being able to push this agenda through movies, univerties, government grands. Hell Elon’s entire companies are built on government tax subsidies. He ain’t no genius at all. He’s just a better actor than Tom Cruise.
the marketing message is nothing but confusing an individual’s soul. Making them feel worthless without fake tits or whatever
This is people doing evil. This has nothing to do with technology.
Hell Elon’s entire companies are built on government tax subsidies
This is totally not true. I assume you mean Tesla, not Spacex, Neuralink, or The Boring Company.
Tesla paid back all loans. They are the first company of this nature to do so ever. They receive zero government subsidies now for their electric cars. Even if that were not true, it's not actually Musk's company. Its a public company, which Must is not a fan of.
SpaceX is all his own. It almost broke him. He got lucky his tech worked finally or we wouldn't be having this conversation. Does he have government contracts and grants? Yes. That is how the whole show works. They are the primary contractors for such technology. Absolutely nothing wrong with that in principle. If you have a specific grievance of some particular contract or grant then lay it on me, but in general, their finances have been more above board than any large company in the history of America.
Are there no technologies or innovations, even in the last couple decades, that you don't find regrettable and chalk up as a negative in terms of societal impact?
Only those that directly impact the lives of others, against their will or input.
blocking out the sun with aerosols because that's considered a technological development and his small group of elitist friends agree it's beneficial for mankind (or their agendas)?
I'm fairly certain this qualifies as being something that directly impacts the lives of others against their will or input.
Surely a nuanced discussion needs to take place for every technological development that has the potential to impact people who aren't voluntary participants.
Its not so nuanced. Does it directly impact any persons own pursuit of life, liberty or happiness?
[Yes] [No]
If yes, find another way.
If no, proceed.
In what way does Neuralink fall into the "yes" category?
Everything you just said is a fear based prediction. It has nothing to do with reality. Every transformative technology has suffered similar fear based predictions. I am not suggesting we go blindly into transformative technologies with no caution. On the contrary, caution is how we have always survived every transformation. But every time we stifle innovation for fear, we lose humanity, not gain it. We ARE our innovation. That is what makes us human. Without that, we are... I don't know what we are, but we aren't human.
But it might be short sighted and exempted by certain extreme circumstances.
I suggest that there is nothing more shortsighted than purely speculative fear based decisions.
Fear should never do anything more than provide a path for a cautionary approach. It should never say "lets not go down this path" just because the lights aren't on.
You said it well. Their proganda machine is outta control. Pretending we have a choice when in less than a year we wouldn’t have a choice in damn near anything.
Their 100 year experiment on humans psychological, trauma, sexual abuse, murder had gone on long enough. We are at our breaking point and they knew it would come to this. They had their endgame planned since the. 1954 Bilderburg meeting. The writing was on the wall so to speak. It’s the final countdown. We are getting a small preview of what kinda even bigger hell hole would’ve been like had we not fought back.
So you would promote restricting innovation for your moral judgements?
Who are you to decide what is or is not appropriate path for our technological development. Even if you have 10,000 friends that believe as you do, by what right do you have to decide such choices for the rest of humanity?
That is exactly the mindset behind The Great Reset. A world where we are protected from ourselves by our elite overlords.
I suggest if it does not directly impact your own pursuit of life, liberty and happiness, you should have no say in the doings of others.
Who are you is the precisely the correct question to ask as you do. We each should have sovereignty over our body and choices and what we believe. Problem is the last few centuries its been anything but. This transhumanism is an attempt to dehumanize your individuality.
Think how charismatic the Clintons were. We sheep are so gullible yet we think we our so intelligent with our egos. It’s our downfall. Symbology is their downfall.
I love how iPhone’s spelling checker doesn’t recognize transhumanism and adrenochrome. Hiding something Apple?
I agree. It has been made to be exactly that. But the tools of what you call "transhumanism" are just tools. The fact that they have been used to dehumanize is an evil use of a tool for evil purposes by evil people.
Anytime you look at tech and think "how evil" are you thinking of the tool, or potential abuse you see? Are you thinking of all the sins of our overlords when you think that?
They have invaded us, and destroyed our morality and decisions; hijacked our tools and ideas to destroy us. That is not the fault of the tool. It is not the fault of our ideas. It is not the fault of innovation. It is the fault of our evil overlords and their hijacking of our good tools for their evil designs.
I concur. Always tech can be used for good or bad. However, the marketing message is nothing but confusing an individual’s soul. Making them feel worthless without fake tits or whatever. They can never steal or take your soul. But if you surrender your soul they gotcha.
So in a convoluted way I guess I’m arguing against them being able to push this agenda through movies, univerties, government grands. Hell Elon’s entire companies are built on government tax subsidies. He ain’t no genius at all. He’s just a better actor than Tom Cruise.
This is people doing evil. This has nothing to do with technology.
This is totally not true. I assume you mean Tesla, not Spacex, Neuralink, or The Boring Company.
Tesla paid back all loans. They are the first company of this nature to do so ever. They receive zero government subsidies now for their electric cars. Even if that were not true, it's not actually Musk's company. Its a public company, which Must is not a fan of.
SpaceX is all his own. It almost broke him. He got lucky his tech worked finally or we wouldn't be having this conversation. Does he have government contracts and grants? Yes. That is how the whole show works. They are the primary contractors for such technology. Absolutely nothing wrong with that in principle. If you have a specific grievance of some particular contract or grant then lay it on me, but in general, their finances have been more above board than any large company in the history of America.
Only those that directly impact the lives of others, against their will or input.
I'm fairly certain this qualifies as being something that directly impacts the lives of others against their will or input.
Its not so nuanced. Does it directly impact any persons own pursuit of life, liberty or happiness?
[Yes] [No]
If yes, find another way.
If no, proceed.
In what way does Neuralink fall into the "yes" category?
Everything you just said is a fear based prediction. It has nothing to do with reality. Every transformative technology has suffered similar fear based predictions. I am not suggesting we go blindly into transformative technologies with no caution. On the contrary, caution is how we have always survived every transformation. But every time we stifle innovation for fear, we lose humanity, not gain it. We ARE our innovation. That is what makes us human. Without that, we are... I don't know what we are, but we aren't human.
I suggest that there is nothing more shortsighted than purely speculative fear based decisions.
Fear should never do anything more than provide a path for a cautionary approach. It should never say "lets not go down this path" just because the lights aren't on.
You said it well. Their proganda machine is outta control. Pretending we have a choice when in less than a year we wouldn’t have a choice in damn near anything.
Their 100 year experiment on humans psychological, trauma, sexual abuse, murder had gone on long enough. We are at our breaking point and they knew it would come to this. They had their endgame planned since the. 1954 Bilderburg meeting. The writing was on the wall so to speak. It’s the final countdown. We are getting a small preview of what kinda even bigger hell hole would’ve been like had we not fought back.
At what point did I suggest anyone didn't have a right to comment? I'm not even sure what this could possibly mean.