Love is Love literally means that any type of Love is acceptable and the left is pushing the Overton window further and further over. You need to look no further than drag queen story hour run by pedophiles.
Right, but obviously that information would be scrubbed by now. This is something older centipedes have said that they remember from the NAMBLA marches in the ‘70s.
I'm in my 50s. I remember watching the news and seeing all that, I never heard that phrase. I'm not defending anyone or anything like that, I just think this is one of those things that was added later and people are now saying it's NAMBLA or something.
I don't disagree at all with what they are saying, I just like stuff to be accurate because I see how wrong people get the Q drops all the time and I've kind of just started researching everything I read.
It's not an anti evolution stance it's an anti macro evolution stance.
The judeo Christian worldview isnt against microevolution and the evolutionary worldview still hasn't proven macro evolution. We have mountains of evidence for micro evolution but I extreme lack of evidence for macro evolution.
You can't have objective standards of morality without presupposing the judeo-christian worldview. Otherwise you're just mattor floating through space acted upon by time and chance. Cosmic death making noise signifying absolutely nothing.
A round table discussion with other scientists. Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: https://youtu.be/noj4phMT9OE
I know it seemed like Evolution was settled science but it looks like that was all a corporate media illusion in which alternative scientific voices were suppressed from the conversation (sound familiar?). These are not religious arguments either. These are the hard sciences questioning Darwin’s soft science, which is based on very little and really has no evidence.
When this really came into focus for me is when I drew a distinction between the concept of evolution and the concept of adaptation. A lot of people kneejerk believe in evolution but they are actually picturing adaptation. The idea of evolution - that a rock will eventually evolve into a fish, then the fish will turn into a monkey, and so on - is about as valid as 32 genders.
Also, when Darwin came up with his theories, he wasn’t really able to do the math. That’s why a lot of the pushback against this is coming from mathematicians and, surprisingly, economists - people who aren’t so intimidated by big numbers. Most scientists just turn off their mind if you say “billions and billions” or “more years than there are grains of sand on Earth”. But none of that is science. Then a mathematician comes along and says, “OK. But how many grains of sand, precisely.” And that’s when you will see a guy like Neil Degrasse-Tyson start his tap shoe dancing, start his song and dance. It’s because these idiots don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about. It’s all just the same mind control shit CNN does. You’re just supposed to trust them and not look into it too much. “January 6th was an insurrection. Just trust us.” “Trump colluded with Russia. Just trust us.” “Hydroxychloroquine is poison. Just trust us. Science says so.” This bullshit has been going on for thousands of years.
But we have enough time in human history without any evidence of macro evolution (in which one species jumps and becomes another) that we are able to work some of this out mathematically and even if you say the Earth is six billion years old, or sixty, or six thousand trillion, it actually still isn’t enough time to accomplish what they say was accomplished. Oops. Darwin didn’t do the math.
That is literally the idea of evolution - over time, through natural variation and sexual selection, all species evolve from one to another, all going back to a common ancestor and the Big Bang. That is how this is all explained. We start with dead material (here characterized as rock - the materialist view of creation), and then through a series of small gradual changes we arrive at Man. Are you saying the Darwinian view is not that humanity evolved out of the ocean? It seems like you are last-minute trying to change your own theory now that mathematicians have debunked it.
That's disgusting.
That was my thought exactly. That is Disgusting!!!
I wish "love is love" was about dudes doing anal.
"Love is Love" always reads like "we fuck kids" to me.
You read the words Love is Love and think about people fucking children ... what?
Love is Love literally means that any type of Love is acceptable and the left is pushing the Overton window further and further over. You need to look no further than drag queen story hour run by pedophiles.
thinking about dudes doing anal is better?
Love is Love is definitely about normalizing child predation.
"Pederasty is a sexual orientation - not a crime - love is love"
You're asking if it's better to think of gay men or pedophiles ... Seriously?
How much dick do you suck?
Seriously? Grow up.
Learn to read a thread before you start talking shit, or people will keep treating you like shill.
I believe it was NAMBLA, a pedophile organization, that first coined the phrase.
I don't think that's the case at all, I did a quick search and it doesn't look that way.
Right, but obviously that information would be scrubbed by now. This is something older centipedes have said that they remember from the NAMBLA marches in the ‘70s.
I'm in my 50s. I remember watching the news and seeing all that, I never heard that phrase. I'm not defending anyone or anything like that, I just think this is one of those things that was added later and people are now saying it's NAMBLA or something.
Could be. I think if NAMBLA did start the “Love is love” stuff, it was very fringe.
I found the source of this belief, it's an old Catholic trope. Apparently they were upset that all of their priests were banging little kids so they went on the offensive against NAMBLA and started this. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/where-love-is-love-goes-wrong
I don't disagree at all with what they are saying, I just like stuff to be accurate because I see how wrong people get the Q drops all the time and I've kind of just started researching everything I read.
Always cringe when I see this trash...
MSM indoctrination is strong, see how people are so excited to euthanize themselves, it's sad
Be fun to go swap these out, see how long it takes them to notice.
How low can they go??
I am hoping this was meant to be satire?
It's not an anti evolution stance it's an anti macro evolution stance.
The judeo Christian worldview isnt against microevolution and the evolutionary worldview still hasn't proven macro evolution. We have mountains of evidence for micro evolution but I extreme lack of evidence for macro evolution.
You can't have objective standards of morality without presupposing the judeo-christian worldview. Otherwise you're just mattor floating through space acted upon by time and chance. Cosmic death making noise signifying absolutely nothing.
Dr. David Berlinski Refutes Evolution in Under Five Minutes: https://youtu.be/SOtGb8hKyWE
Further Explanation: https://youtu.be/Z6ElA0--JNg
A round table discussion with other scientists. Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: https://youtu.be/noj4phMT9OE
I know it seemed like Evolution was settled science but it looks like that was all a corporate media illusion in which alternative scientific voices were suppressed from the conversation (sound familiar?). These are not religious arguments either. These are the hard sciences questioning Darwin’s soft science, which is based on very little and really has no evidence.
When this really came into focus for me is when I drew a distinction between the concept of evolution and the concept of adaptation. A lot of people kneejerk believe in evolution but they are actually picturing adaptation. The idea of evolution - that a rock will eventually evolve into a fish, then the fish will turn into a monkey, and so on - is about as valid as 32 genders.
Also, when Darwin came up with his theories, he wasn’t really able to do the math. That’s why a lot of the pushback against this is coming from mathematicians and, surprisingly, economists - people who aren’t so intimidated by big numbers. Most scientists just turn off their mind if you say “billions and billions” or “more years than there are grains of sand on Earth”. But none of that is science. Then a mathematician comes along and says, “OK. But how many grains of sand, precisely.” And that’s when you will see a guy like Neil Degrasse-Tyson start his tap shoe dancing, start his song and dance. It’s because these idiots don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about. It’s all just the same mind control shit CNN does. You’re just supposed to trust them and not look into it too much. “January 6th was an insurrection. Just trust us.” “Trump colluded with Russia. Just trust us.” “Hydroxychloroquine is poison. Just trust us. Science says so.” This bullshit has been going on for thousands of years.
But we have enough time in human history without any evidence of macro evolution (in which one species jumps and becomes another) that we are able to work some of this out mathematically and even if you say the Earth is six billion years old, or sixty, or six thousand trillion, it actually still isn’t enough time to accomplish what they say was accomplished. Oops. Darwin didn’t do the math.
That is literally the idea of evolution - over time, through natural variation and sexual selection, all species evolve from one to another, all going back to a common ancestor and the Big Bang. That is how this is all explained. We start with dead material (here characterized as rock - the materialist view of creation), and then through a series of small gradual changes we arrive at Man. Are you saying the Darwinian view is not that humanity evolved out of the ocean? It seems like you are last-minute trying to change your own theory now that mathematicians have debunked it.