Even then, there is no reason to take an experimental vaccin that is not fda approved, especially when there are viable medications available.
The lack of accessibility and the constant barrage of propaganda may make it seem the vaccin is the only viable option. It is not.
There is ample reason to counter a push by an employer to force you into vaccination.
-1. it is not a vaccin, it is a gmo experimental medical procedure
-2. that requires your freely given consent, so no pressure is allowed. Meaning, an employer coercing you to take it, is in breach of international treaties (law of the land) and potentially is criminally liable in the blackmail department.
-3. Lacking FDA approval, it may not be called a cure.
-4. RICO charges could apply.
-5. Since testing is unreliable, and actually a hoax, as it does not proof you are sarscov free, forcing you to undergo an invasive medical procedure, would add to points 1 -4.
-6. discrimination on alleged medical grounds and wrongful termination may apply.
Doing what you are proposing is opening you up to potentially dire consequences, and no amount of reimbursed damages can cure that. This brings us to the issue of relief. FRN's may look like relief, but in nominal and intrinsic value, it is not. So, maybe, slipping in a payment in gold would an additional scare device.
I would look at your proposal as a strategic device, to throw a spanner in their efforts. No more.
Even then, there is no reason to take an experimental vaccin that is not fda approved, especially when there are viable medications available.
The lack of accessibility and the constant barrage of propaganda may make it seem the vaccin is the only viable option. It is not.
There is ample reason to counter a push by an employer to force you into vaccination.
-1. it is not a vaccin, it is a gmo experimental medical procedure -2. that requires your freely given consent, so no pressure is allowed. Meaning, an employer coercing you to take it, is in breach of international treaties (law of the land) and potentially is criminally liable in the blackmail department. -3. Lacking FDA approval, it may not be called a cure. -4. RICO charges could apply. -5. Since testing is unreliable, and actually a hoax, as it does not proof you are sarscov free, forcing you to undergo an invasive medical procedure, would add to points 1 -4. -6. discrimination on alleged medical grounds and wrongful termination may apply.
Doing what you are proposing is opening you up to potentially dire consequences, and no amount of reimbursed damages can cure that. This brings us to the issue of relief. FRN's may look like relief, but in nominal and intrinsic value, it is not. So, maybe, slipping in a payment in gold would an additional scare device.
I would look at your proposal as a strategic device, to throw a spanner in their efforts. No more.