So I was just reading the news/GA post about MTG and AOC. Democrats never engage with Reps outside of official debates or on the House or senate floor (although thati is not really a debate!) I think Rush has trained me well to look at current events with a critical, questioning eye, as well as having taught us all for decades what the Dems always do. An MTG - AOC debate would be VERY atypical. (I sure wish he were here now to comment on all this!)
Anyway, I started thinking about AOC. Came out of nowhere to win in a Brooklyn district. No one really knows her from that area. Elected in 2018 when a lot of cheating occurred. Pelosi seemingly hates her. Pushing the Dems really far left quickly. Pals around with known leftist, problem women in Congress.
What if? ... she was pushed in by white hats to be a disrupter? To help pull out the leftist, really progressive elements so that they are really visible. She has been quiet as of late (as have a lot of Congress turds) until this latest kerfluffle with MTG. So it may be that she’s made a deal to act like she is now, to publicly debate the New Green Deal. Or has she been an actor all along?
Anywho, these are my morning musings and I welcome others to chime in!
So I know that someone did a deep dive and good analysis of how AOC was elected but I always go back to Q’s words.... What makes a good movie? Good actors!
Are we 100% positive that she was put into office by the people that we are led to believe did? What if that corrupt Dem made a deal to make it look like he alone was responsible?
Sometimes I think we are too quick to believe one anon’s analysis. Yes, it could be correct and yet, there could also be more data out there that he/she was not aware of.