Drinking human blood OR eating brains does not make you young or high, in fact it can make you sick.
Finding a young person who has the same blood type as you, withdrawing their blood and then putting that younger blood into your body will make you young because your body will use the younger stem cells that are present in their blood. These stem cells will travel to all your body’s organs and replenish them.
Performing a Satanic blood sacrifice ceremony on a child or baby in order to feel powerful or attempt steal their soul does not make you young.
If you want to get high on Epinephrine or adrenaline find a corrupt allergy doctor and get them to subscribe you a bunch of emergency epinephrine injections.
If the very first thing you tell your friends about the crimes of the global elites is centered on Adrenochrome, you are perpetuating the disinformation campaign. I mean, isn’t child sex trafficking and rape bad enough and isn’t there a ton of evidence for those crimes? Why are you jabbering on about an unproven disinformation campaign like Adrenochrome?
I read through his stuff and the guy is completely ignorant of how any of it even works. For one thing when Trump started bring the hammer down on Child Trafficking the price of epi-pens shot up. Why? Oh, like anyone afraid of losing their supply they did attempt to make stock with the artificially-made stuff. What's one good source?
Epi-pens.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie500037x
When an epi-pen expires its epinephrine is oxidized into adrenochrome. This can be a synthetic source of adrenochrome. So why don't the elite just use the synthetic stuff instead of the real stuff?
Well, same logic as why we don't want to eat synthetic meat. It might be better than nothing but it won't work as well as the real thing. In fact, it will likely do more harm than good. Most synthetics are just not as good as the real thing.
This is because we still don't actually understand the mechanism of how proteins fold. We can make things that look similar to the proteins, but the fold is not the exactly the same.
When a section of DNA is read and coded into an mRNA strand, that strand is shipped to the ribosome to be make amino acids (like a string of pearls) and then they form into a protein that is folded. Here is the step we can't understand and where the science truly fails. We don't have any idea how to fold the protein exactly like the original. We make an imperfectly folded protein that is close enough to work, but it doesn't work as real as the real stuff.
How important are those folds? Think of it this way: you can make a fake key to unlock a door like the real one, but if the fake key is imperfect it might get stuck in the door. It unlocks the door, but gets stuck in the lock and the door now can never be closed.
This is what happens with cocaine. It is a mimic of dopamine, but not a perfect one. As people use cocaine many of their dopamine receptors become permanently blocked as the mimic can't let go of the receptor like normal dopamine would. The fake keys get jammed in the locks and the doors are stuck.
Using synthetic adrenochrome for the purpose the elites want carries the same problem. It's no better than a street drug. They want the real stuff for a reason.
Drug makers can't fold proteins like our body can. We can only make copies that are close enough to do the job, but they're imperfect. Protein folding is still an area of science we don't understand well. We invent drugs that are imitations of hormones and proteins. The way we do it is by trying to recreate and the amino acid change and then hoping it'll magically fold as close as possible to the original. If the drug works close enough to the original then the drug maker is like "Weeee, success!" It's just trial and error.
No drug humans make will ever be as good as the original unless by random chance we manage to get it to fold in the exact same way as the original. Which statistically will almost never happen.