So there was watermarks!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (284)
sorted by:
This is fucking YUGE!!!!!! Dark to light. What's been done in the dark will be brought to the UV light. I've watched Jovan's testimony before the GA panel, and his system can detect A LOT. I don't know how it works, but the only reason I can see the person doing what they did in the video is to look for a watermark. Folds, creases, printed or photocopied; I would think, would require a more minute examination, instead of what we just saw on the video. What other reason could they be looking at a ballot in such a cursory manner? So if there is a watermark to be detected, is that nation wide or just in MC in AZ? I remember when we first heard about watermarks in Nov., 202o I did a search and could find no source to verify it. How did President Trump, and others in the know, manage to keep quiet about this about and not alert the enemy if it's true? OMFG I'm on the roller coaster again! How can we confirm this is true?
Every jurisdiction (sometimes state, sometimes county) does its own contract with printing companies worldwide to get its ballots printed according to their specifications. So no way is there a nationwide ballot watermark, but it is not impossible that the Maricopa County ballots were watermarked.
Printers "sign" things they print with dot matrix "watermarks"
Someone else was saying that the paper used for ballots must be provided by the US Printing Office by law. That would mean national watermarks are definitely possible.
That “someone else” won’t be able to point to that law because it doesn’t exist.