So when Krebs was saying this was the most secure election he was baiting the left to rally around him?
Was this really the most secure election after all and it was just a matter of getting here - and opening the door for everyone to deny the possibility of Fraud until the watermark could be revealed?
I just posted this on another post. I am really intrigued by this angle. Maybe he was a white hat after all!
Is it possible to implement a security mesaure of this massive scale without the head of CISA knowing? If he was a white hat it makes sense. He pretends to be black hat, gets "fired", giving the DS the assurance that everything is still in control.
So, was Krebs a good guy?
So when Krebs was saying this was the most secure election he was baiting the left to rally around him?
Was this really the most secure election after all and it was just a matter of getting here - and opening the door for everyone to deny the possibility of Fraud until the watermark could be revealed?
I just posted this on another post. I am really intrigued by this angle. Maybe he was a white hat after all!
Is it possible to implement a security mesaure of this massive scale without the head of CISA knowing? If he was a white hat it makes sense. He pretends to be black hat, gets "fired", giving the DS the assurance that everything is still in control.
Crazy timeline, we live in.