Maricopa County Supreme Court judge recuses himself? What exactly does that mean? Good or bad?? - The Great Awakening

Maricopa County Supreme Court judge recuses himself? What exactly does that mean? Good or bad?? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by PolishBaldEagle 3 years ago by PolishBaldEagle +232 / -0

66 comments download

66 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (66)

sorted by:

▲ 29 ▼

– AlecLeamas 29 points 3 years ago +29 / -0

So Judge Coury didn't have a conflict of interest requiring his recusal until Sunday afternoon when a new lawyer, Chris Viskovic, entered his appearance for the first time.

The Judge could not have seen this coming, but attorney Viskovic certainly knew that by his joining the case, that would prompt Judge Coury to recuse himself.

It's right there on his law firm's web page, which states in part:

"Christopher Alfredo Viskovic is an associate attorney with Kolodin Law Group PLLC who received both his Bachelor of Science in Political Science and Juris Doctor from Arizona State University.

During his time in law school, Mr. Viskovic interned with Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Coury, and the State Elections Director Eric Spencer under Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan." https://kolodinlaw.com/about-us/

So this appears strategic on the part of Attorney Viskovic and whoever he is working with. Note that he also worked with the State Elections Director.

This is an underhanded tactic some lawyers use to try to get rid of a judge they don't want on a case they're trying.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 11 ▼

– Warrior_of_Virtue 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Hmm, isn‘t there any legal possibility that the Lawyer has to get off that case instead of the judge having to recuse himself?

I mean, the lawsuit was filed last week, and the new lawyer was taken aboard after the initial filing of the suit...

Isn‘t there any legal way to exclude this lawyer and shine some light on this dirty trick?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q