Oh can you do this for Ars Technica? IMO it's sadly been one of the most intellectually deteriorated websites I've been a part of. The discourse there has become worthless after the Conde Nast acquisition.
It's a great tactic, helpful for new users that come here looking for info and serves as good reminders and training for the veterans on here. You are doing the Lord's work.
edit: I like how you call them Golems, but it might make the info less likely to be accepted by anyone who currently doesn't share your viewpoints; maybe just call them media sheep or media slaves, media Golem just seems like you are trying to be insulting
lol i get that but I imagine many people seeing a post like this calling people Golems and just immediately dismissing it, no matter how good the content is. Either way, keep it up, i've seen tons of your posts today and they are all great.
Ad hominem and strawman arguments.
Oh can you do this for Ars Technica? IMO it's sadly been one of the most intellectually deteriorated websites I've been a part of. The discourse there has become worthless after the Conde Nast acquisition.
Thank you for this series. It's really quite good.
We spend a lot of time responding to the cabals tactics but this sort of analysis is a vast, untapped resource.
It's a great tactic, helpful for new users that come here looking for info and serves as good reminders and training for the veterans on here. You are doing the Lord's work.
edit: I like how you call them Golems, but it might make the info less likely to be accepted by anyone who currently doesn't share your viewpoints; maybe just call them media sheep or media slaves, media Golem just seems like you are trying to be insulting
lol i get that but I imagine many people seeing a post like this calling people Golems and just immediately dismissing it, no matter how good the content is. Either way, keep it up, i've seen tons of your posts today and they are all great.
Never ever count on an honor system.
One updoot for you. Good autist