Watermarked ballots makes sense. Ballots watermarked with “non-radioactive isotopes” does not. I think the latter was the one that people were laughing at.
To be fair, radioactive isotopes IS the claim. No one would be shocked by the ballots having a watermark. The claim is every ballot can be individually tracked through the watermark, saying anything else is goal post moving.
Us Qtards proven right, again, not tired of all this winning
Well A when it comes to winning we ain't even broke a sweat yet.
Watermarked ballots makes sense. Ballots watermarked with “non-radioactive isotopes” does not. I think the latter was the one that people were laughing at.
Here's how it works.
Shill A: "Ballots have radioactive isotopes on watermarks!"
Shill B: "All Q followers think ballots have radioactive isotopes on watermarks!"
Patriot: "Wow, look, the watermarks were real all along."
Shills: "But you were still wrong about radioactive isotopes!"
To be fair, radioactive isotopes IS the claim. No one would be shocked by the ballots having a watermark. The claim is every ballot can be individually tracked through the watermark, saying anything else is goal post moving.
To be fair, if Q didn't say it then Q didn't say it.
To attribute the speculation of some anons as a poor reflection on the entire Q movement is a logical fallacy.
There's a reason why there is Q and there are anons and there is no Qanon.