I remember too
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Watermarked ballots makes sense. Ballots watermarked with “non-radioactive isotopes” does not. I think the latter was the one that people were laughing at.
Here's how it works.
Shill A: "Ballots have radioactive isotopes on watermarks!"
Shill B: "All Q followers think ballots have radioactive isotopes on watermarks!"
Patriot: "Wow, look, the watermarks were real all along."
Shills: "But you were still wrong about radioactive isotopes!"
To be fair, radioactive isotopes IS the claim. No one would be shocked by the ballots having a watermark. The claim is every ballot can be individually tracked through the watermark, saying anything else is goal post moving.
To be fair, if Q didn't say it then Q didn't say it.
To attribute the speculation of some anons as a poor reflection on the entire Q movement is a logical fallacy.
There's a reason why there is Q and there are anons and there is no Qanon.