Judge about to decide on the TRO for Arizona
(www.theepochtimes.com)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Deferred! I didn't expect that.
Yep, me either, just came here to say the same.
what does that mean?
It means they prolly got a contract to turn the hearing into a series for this season...c ya tomorrow...for today, the audit go's on
The plaintiffs' argument is so flimsy
The argument is so ludicrously vague that I would ask them to specify what is being violated.
Cyber Ninja can and should provide a whole bunch of useless information to the plaintiffs. Give them so much inane paper work that it'll take weeks to go through it. Shit send them Lindell's proof to add insult to injury.
The plaintiffs' have no real standing anyway. This is a right specified in the state Constitution exclusively for the legislature. If they want to continue they are absolutely in the right to do so.
Ballots don't go bad. The whole argument that the ballots will some how deteriorate in the auditors hands is absurd with no evidence to back it up.
I really want to see the caller list of people calling the Democratic Party of Arizona. I it will help gauge the severity of the plaintiffs supposed issues.
The mouse will fight until the snake squeezes all air from its lungs....even as the eyes are bulging from its skull
That's why you got to be a pissed of mongoose. That's the best way to go through life.
I'm going to identify as a honey badger this month?
looking like that perkins/ clinton backed judge is gonna rule for the injunction! Straight bs! When he said the AZ auditors have not proven that the voter's privacy is being safeguarded was his roundabout way of saying where he stands. Not surprising.
So this is good news... On with the Audit