Sign In or Create an Account
Yes, if disproportionate services are offered or rendered to the different campaigns, that would clearly be an in-kind contribution.
It might be difficult to prove in court. But the court of law isn't the point. The point is the court of public opinion.
From a historic perspective, the rise of Hitler comes to mind. The majority of his rise to power was either legal or in a grey area. That, combined with forced compliance of corporations and media, some false flags and presto! We have a new form of government.
I wonder if negotiations are going on behind the scenes as this gets dripped out.
Glow boy meltdown. Completely love it.
This is an absolute wild movie. No one guessed that Ye would have a full scale meltdown on Alex Jones. I'm full-on blown away!
This so much! Very little value in friendly fire.
I would refer you to the 1979 ruling - Burch v Louisiana. Here, the court established that a jury must be composed of at least 6 people and that a non-unanimous conviction by juries of less than 12 people is not valid.
I think you would find that the 6th amendment was written intentionally vague, because the original colonies were not in agreement as to the structure of their judicial system.
I do not know how far back 6 person juries go in the US, but it has been a while. Check this archive.org article from 2015:
At the end of the day, I think you are right based upon the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. It was based largely on this, that Louisiana's non-unanimous jury convictions were overturned. I am torn from a perspective of state sovereignty.
So, I am aware and love the basis for the number 12. It's literally drawn from the number of disciples of Jesus. I love that.
The argument that 12 is an inviolable number is absurd, given that 12 is the law of the land in only 34 of the 50 states of our country.
I am not sure on this one. It seems that this is a question of tradition versus what is actually in the Constitution. It was a tradition that a jury consists of 12 people. It is not in the constitution as such.
I would imagine the slippery slope came into play here. Are there other constitutional disputes between the literal interpretation and traditions in effect at the time which would be affected by a ruling that the tradition of a 12 person jury establishes the Constitutional meaning of the term and thus defines the meaning of the right to a trial by jury?
It's interesting - I do not believe the courts can circumvent certification. Quite probably they can order certification at the threat of sanctions. Perhaps they can order the removal of officials who refuse to certify. I'd be very interested to know if there is any precedent for such a conflict.
Amazing. I sure hope he survived.
OK - something changed on YouTube. I have not been watching Kappy for quite some time. I'm pretty sure the videos were all banned. So now I am suddenly getting them as suggested videos.
Yea...not 20-0 or 15-0. Jr goes full Q.
Still up on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MhSvFNejItEQ/
I do not know anything about this topic, but I did read a book from 1957 called "The Scourge of the Swastika". On page 208, it does specifically site the 6MM number:
I will investigate more.
I believe you are correct with regards to the Russian regulars. The Russian atrocities are not systematic like the Ukrainian war crimes, but they are certainly happening.
Because I lived in Ukraine and Russia and have friends on all sides of this conflict, I am pretty wrapped up in it. I've seen the Wagner videos published on their Telegram channel showing their acts of cruelty.
Note - I completely agree that one side is systematic in brutality and the other is not. My point is just that there is more to this story than meets the eye. It is not news that war crimes happen in war. What is news is that the machine allowed the news to get to the normies.
I have high hopes for the Great Awakening to truly blossom by this time next year. I bet next year's holiday season will be a time of great Thanksgiving for you and your family.
Yea, I didn't take it as a glowie. I see where you're coming from now, since most of these memes are about glowies.
Yea...now you are repeating cover propaganda. At least 10 of the soldiers are videoed face down and unarmed. If the last dude out came out blazing, then they didn't have to mow down the dudes face down in the dirt.
Well...that's going to far. There were no good guys in WW2.
The interesting thing isn't that this happened. Both sides have been brutal to each other. The interesting thing is that the West didn't jump on Ukraine's BS cover story. The cover story is that the last guy out of the house came out shooting and took cover behind his comrades! Stupid, but no more stupid than other BS stories that normies have been fed.
What is interesting is that this story is hitting mainstream media. This must indicate that the US is either extorting behavior out of Zely or they are ditching them entirely.
The Azov scum have videos of executing Russian soldiers with sledge hammers. We covered that crap up.
He is EXACTLY correct. The globalist scum will lose. Doesn't matter if it's D or R, they are one big, perverted family.
There is nothing he said that is inaccurate.
That's solid advice.
Yea, I forgot about Praying Medic. I'll check it!
OK, I know it won't actually convince her, but if there are any zero deltas in this book that happened after the date of publication, it will destroy that argument! thanks fren.
Yea, this is the part she is on board with.
Good point - that is actually quite the conspiracy! It means that somehow all the sites referencing Q posts are either somehow hacked or in on it :)