No it's imperative we don't let one guy inject a theory that Kelly is bad after everyone had her back for awhile. I've seen lots of posts questioning Pompeo this week too. I thought it would be worth starting this discussion that not every book deal is a sign.
Maybe Kelly is DS? but when we are in a huge week and I start to see posts discrediting all of the people trump has around him, I would assume it's a perfect opportunity for a shill to make a post just like this. 79 people glance and read and assume Kelly is bad, they tell other people, all of a sudden people lose more hope as they think other people are jumping ship on Trumps cabinet.
Either way, we are discussing it now instead of just assuming she's bad.
Make a post about that then. The title doesn't match the intent of your message and could be poisoning the well. I'm not defending or pro
I'm arguing from a point where the person getting the book deal is person XX, not Kelly specifically.
Yes, through other means we have learned Kelly may be DS but al least we discussed it. So now people scrolling through don't just assume book deals makes innocent people guilty. It's up for them to decide if she is legit or not based on all known info, not just one fact that she got a book deal.
maybe you are the shill
No it's imperative we don't let one guy inject a theory that Kelly is bad after everyone had her back for awhile. I've seen lots of posts questioning Pompeo this week too. I thought it would be worth starting this discussion that not every book deal is a sign.
Maybe Kelly is DS? but when we are in a huge week and I start to see posts discrediting all of the people trump has around him, I would assume it's a perfect opportunity for a shill to make a post just like this. 79 people glance and read and assume Kelly is bad, they tell other people, all of a sudden people lose more hope as they think other people are jumping ship on Trumps cabinet.
Either way, we are discussing it now instead of just assuming she's bad.
I suggest we let it play out & keep an eye on that book/her next moves.
She might be compromised & this is just a sign, though DS can play with counter moves & false impressions too.
I always thought she was good
Do you really think Kelly and her husband didn’t talk? Lol please.
Make a post about that then. The title doesn't match the intent of your message and could be poisoning the well. I'm not defending or pro
I'm arguing from a point where the person getting the book deal is person XX, not Kelly specifically.
Yes, through other means we have learned Kelly may be DS but al least we discussed it. So now people scrolling through don't just assume book deals makes innocent people guilty. It's up for them to decide if she is legit or not based on all known info, not just one fact that she got a book deal.